Vicarious Religion and Fiscal Instruments: The Danish Debate on the ELC’s Funding

The relationship between the state and religious institutions in Denmark is unique due to the Evangelical-Lutheran Church’s (ELC) integration with state functions. Historically recognized as a state church under Denmark’s 1849 Constitution, the ELC has hitherto been financially supported by the government. In a modern pluralistic society, however, this arrangement raises questions about secularism, national identity, and religious freedom. The debate on Church financing, highlighted by a 2016 parliamentary proposal, aimed to reform how the Church is funded by suggesting that clergy salaries should be covered by church taxes rather than state subsidies. Rather than merely describing parliamentary speeches, the article explains variations in party positions by linking fiscal instrument design, constitutional constraints, and “vicarious religion” logics. It specifies testable implications regarding when parties push for member-funded proclamation versus state-funded heritage and administration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Religion and Society
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/njrs.38.2.4
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vicarious Religion and Fiscal Instruments: The Danish Debate on the ELC’s Funding

Nordic Journal of Religion and Society
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Vicarious Religion and Fiscal Instruments: The Danish Debate on the ELC’s Funding

article en

Abstract

The relationship between the state and religious institutions in Denmark is unique due to the Evangelical-Lutheran Church’s (ELC) integration with state functions. Historically recognized as a state church under Denmark’s 1849 Constitution, the ELC has hitherto been financially supported by the government. In a modern pluralistic society, however, this arrangement raises questions about secularism, national identity, and religious freedom. The debate on Church financing, highlighted by a 2016 parliamentary proposal, aimed to reform how the Church is funded by suggesting that clergy salaries should be covered by church taxes rather than state subsidies. Rather than merely describing parliamentary speeches, the article explains variations in party positions by linking fiscal instrument design, constitutional constraints, and “vicarious religion” logics. It specifies testable implications regarding when parties push for member-funded proclamation versus state-funded heritage and administration.

Nordic Journal of Religion and SocietyVol. 38(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.