Mitigating systemic financial risk: Does digital financial inclusion matter?

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how digital inclusive finance affects systemic financial risk through spatial modeling. We analyze regional variations and mechanism pathways to understand their risk governance implications in the digital era. Design/methodology/approach We develop a spatial game model for theoretical analysis of digital inclusive finance’s risk mitigation mechanisms. Empirically, we construct a city-level panel data model using China’s digital inclusive finance index and systemic financial risk index to test these relationships quantitatively. Findings Digital inclusive finance fundamentally mitigates systemic risk by enhancing resource allocation efficiency – a mechanism particularly potent under strong financial regulation. Empirically, China’s city-level data confirm a significant risk mitigation effect, with central/western regions showing greater effects than eastern areas. Coverage breadth delivers stronger mitigation than usage depth, demonstrating how implementation dimensions shape real-world outcomes. Practical implications Policymakers should develop tailored regional strategies: prioritize digital inclusive finance’s coverage expansion in underdeveloped regions to bridge financial service gaps while focusing on its usage deepening in mature markets. Crucially, all regions require strengthened prudential regulation to maximize stability benefits through digital-regulatory synergy. Originality/value This study offers implementable frameworks for digital-era financial governance in emerging economies. Using spatial game modeling, it validates digital inclusive finance’s systemic risk mitigation and quantifies coverage breadth’s superiority over usage depth, revealing regional disparities. The work uncovers the regulatory intensity’s threshold effect, exploring digital-regulatory synergy dynamics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Finance Review International
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-06-2025-0423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating systemic financial risk: Does digital financial inclusion matter?

1 citations
China Finance Review International
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

Mitigating systemic financial risk: Does digital financial inclusion matter?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how digital inclusive finance affects systemic financial risk through spatial modeling. We analyze regional variations and mechanism pathways to understand their risk governance implications in the digital era. Design/methodology/approach We develop a spatial game model for theoretical analysis of digital inclusive finance’s risk mitigation mechanisms. Empirically, we construct a city-level panel data model using China’s digital inclusive finance index and systemic financial risk index to test these relationships quantitatively. Findings Digital inclusive finance fundamentally mitigates systemic risk by enhancing resource allocation efficiency – a mechanism particularly potent under strong financial regulation. Empirically, China’s city-level data confirm a significant risk mitigation effect, with central/western regions showing greater effects than eastern areas. Coverage breadth delivers stronger mitigation than usage depth, demonstrating how implementation dimensions shape real-world outcomes. Practical implications Policymakers should develop tailored regional strategies: prioritize digital inclusive finance’s coverage expansion in underdeveloped regions to bridge financial service gaps while focusing on its usage deepening in mature markets. Crucially, all regions require strengthened prudential regulation to maximize stability benefits through digital-regulatory synergy. Originality/value This study offers implementable frameworks for digital-era financial governance in emerging economies. Using spatial game modeling, it validates digital inclusive finance’s systemic risk mitigation and quantifies coverage breadth’s superiority over usage depth, revealing regional disparities. The work uncovers the regulatory intensity’s threshold effect, exploring digital-regulatory synergy dynamics.

China Finance Review International
Minzu University of China (CN), Agricultural Bank of China (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.