Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in the WHO African Region: Systematic Review of Literature from 2011 to 2024

• Most common pathogens: <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (53.7%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (43.2%), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (32.6%). • Resistance profile: ESBL (27.4%), MRSA (21.1%), multidrug resistance (13.7%). • Sources of HAIs: mainly exogenous (83.2%). • Laboratory methods: phenotypic (70.5%), genotypic or genomic rare (3.1%). • Scope of studies: local (96.8%), national (3.2%). Limitations of evidence: Risk of bias due to underreporting of HAIs, methodological heterogeneity, predominance of cross-sectional studies, low use of molecular methods, lack of modeling, and uneven geographical coverage. Overall interpretation and implications: surveillance of HAIs in Africa remains fragmented and poorly standardized. There is a need to strengthen national systems, integrate molecular methods, train professionals, and promote interventional research. The WHO GLASS program can serve as a framework for harmonizing surveillance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14121287
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in the WHO African Region: Systematic Review of Literature from 2011 to 2024

Antibiotics
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in the WHO African Region: Systematic Review of Literature from 2011 to 2024

article en

Abstract

• Most common pathogens: <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (53.7%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (43.2%), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (32.6%). • Resistance profile: ESBL (27.4%), MRSA (21.1%), multidrug resistance (13.7%). • Sources of HAIs: mainly exogenous (83.2%). • Laboratory methods: phenotypic (70.5%), genotypic or genomic rare (3.1%). • Scope of studies: local (96.8%), national (3.2%). Limitations of evidence: Risk of bias due to underreporting of HAIs, methodological heterogeneity, predominance of cross-sectional studies, low use of molecular methods, lack of modeling, and uneven geographical coverage. Overall interpretation and implications: surveillance of HAIs in Africa remains fragmented and poorly standardized. There is a need to strengthen national systems, integrate molecular methods, train professionals, and promote interventional research. The WHO GLASS program can serve as a framework for harmonizing surveillance.

AntibioticsVol. 14(12)
National Health Laboratory Service (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), Institut Pasteur de Côte d'Ivoire (CI), World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (CG), Science Oxford (GB), Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.