Negotiating Assimilation

The interwar period (1918-1939) is a valuable timeframe to examine the entanglement of empire and nation-state, and thus the dynamics of national identity and citizenship within transimperial and colonial contexts. The increased nationalisation of the Belgian Congo led to a strong integration of Luxembourgers – unlike all other white European communities – into the Belgian colonial state from the early 1920s onwards, making them, as they described themselves, the most ‘assimilated’ Europeans in the Belgian colony. Luxembourg’s participation in Belgian colonial ventures was motivated by aspirations for colonial and national prestige, access to transnational networks, economic opportunities, and alignment with a broader pan-European colonial ideology – one that certainly included European states without colonies. Driven by wide-ranging interests, such as those of the Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union, closer ties were developed between Brussels, Luxembourg, and Leopoldville. This article addresses two themes through the lens of Luxembourg’s involvement in the Belgian empire during the interwar period. First, it examines the imperial, colonial, and national tensions that arose between Belgian metropolitan ambitions and colonial realities, with a particular emphasis on the contested issue of the ‘assimilation’ of Luxembourgish subjects. Second, it analyses how Luxembourgers themselves navigated and negotiated their colonial roles and identities in response to the promises of becoming equal to Belgian colonisers – and the contrasting reality they sometimes faced.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.20005
Primary Topic
Central European national history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Assimilation

BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review
Central European national history
article

Negotiating Assimilation

article en

Abstract

The interwar period (1918-1939) is a valuable timeframe to examine the entanglement of empire and nation-state, and thus the dynamics of national identity and citizenship within transimperial and colonial contexts. The increased nationalisation of the Belgian Congo led to a strong integration of Luxembourgers – unlike all other white European communities – into the Belgian colonial state from the early 1920s onwards, making them, as they described themselves, the most ‘assimilated’ Europeans in the Belgian colony. Luxembourg’s participation in Belgian colonial ventures was motivated by aspirations for colonial and national prestige, access to transnational networks, economic opportunities, and alignment with a broader pan-European colonial ideology – one that certainly included European states without colonies. Driven by wide-ranging interests, such as those of the Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union, closer ties were developed between Brussels, Luxembourg, and Leopoldville. This article addresses two themes through the lens of Luxembourg’s involvement in the Belgian empire during the interwar period. First, it examines the imperial, colonial, and national tensions that arose between Belgian metropolitan ambitions and colonial realities, with a particular emphasis on the contested issue of the ‘assimilation’ of Luxembourgish subjects. Second, it analyses how Luxembourgers themselves navigated and negotiated their colonial roles and identities in response to the promises of becoming equal to Belgian colonisers – and the contrasting reality they sometimes faced.

BMGN - Low Countries Historical ReviewVol. 140(4)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Central European national history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.