From demos to dependability: Practical evaluation strategies for AI applications

The advent of Generative AI has transformed how we build AI models and software, but the speed we gain comes at a cost. Large language models (LLMs) let us add "intelligence" to an app in minutes, yet most prototypes stall before production because no one trusts their behaviour. We trace the shift from the traditional data-first, then model pipeline to today’s app-first, then API workflow and explain why it leaves teams blind, often without benchmark datasets or KPIs to judge performance. The talk presents ways Research Software Engineers can close this gap by making evaluation a first-class citizen. We survey three families of evaluation for AI applications: manual prototypes, data-gathering tools, and synthetic benchmark generation, giving an overview of the field. We do a deep dive into the latest research and reflect on lessons learned over the past few years. To ground the theory, we walk through concrete examples from our own projects. Attendees will leave with practical insights for matching evaluation strategy to project maturity, regulatory constraints, and available resources. Evaluation has become the critical bottleneck and RSEs are uniquely placed to turn it into an enabler for reproducible, sustainable science.A recording of this session is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/dCHzTfT1zw8

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17968222
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From demos to dependability: Practical evaluation strategies for AI applications

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

From demos to dependability: Practical evaluation strategies for AI applications

article en

Abstract

The advent of Generative AI has transformed how we build AI models and software, but the speed we gain comes at a cost. Large language models (LLMs) let us add "intelligence" to an app in minutes, yet most prototypes stall before production because no one trusts their behaviour. We trace the shift from the traditional data-first, then model pipeline to today’s app-first, then API workflow and explain why it leaves teams blind, often without benchmark datasets or KPIs to judge performance. The talk presents ways Research Software Engineers can close this gap by making evaluation a first-class citizen. We survey three families of evaluation for AI applications: manual prototypes, data-gathering tools, and synthetic benchmark generation, giving an overview of the field. We do a deep dive into the latest research and reflect on lessons learned over the past few years. To ground the theory, we walk through concrete examples from our own projects. Attendees will leave with practical insights for matching evaluation strategy to project maturity, regulatory constraints, and available resources. Evaluation has become the critical bottleneck and RSEs are uniquely placed to turn it into an enabler for reproducible, sustainable science.A recording of this session is available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/dCHzTfT1zw8

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Weatherford College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.