Blockchain for the Arts and Humanities

ABSTRACT As born‐digital cultural materials proliferate, the arts and humanities require infrastructures that guarantee provenance, authenticity, and equitable access. This paper delivers a comprehensive, critical survey of blockchain's potential and limits across the sector. Moving beyond proof‐of‐concept enthusiasm, the paper queries whether blockchain provides demonstrable advantages over established, centralised solutions and identifies the social, economic, and technical barriers still hindering adoption. After contextualising blockchain's technical genealogy, applications in four domains are evaluated: preservation and provenance, scholarly publishing, proof‐of‐useful‐work (PoUW), and NFTs and cultural value. Bringing these strands together, the study outlines pathways towards a decentralised humanities ecosystem that augments existing practice. Selective pilot projects, community‐driven standards, and federated governance emerge as pragmatic steps to harness blockchain's strengths—immutability, transparency, and distributed trust—while mitigating environmental impact, cost, and exclusion. The paper thus frames blockchain as a contingent tool whose scholarly value depends on careful, collaborative design.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Humanities
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fhu2.70020
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blockchain for the Arts and Humanities

Future Humanities
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Blockchain for the Arts and Humanities

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As born‐digital cultural materials proliferate, the arts and humanities require infrastructures that guarantee provenance, authenticity, and equitable access. This paper delivers a comprehensive, critical survey of blockchain's potential and limits across the sector. Moving beyond proof‐of‐concept enthusiasm, the paper queries whether blockchain provides demonstrable advantages over established, centralised solutions and identifies the social, economic, and technical barriers still hindering adoption. After contextualising blockchain's technical genealogy, applications in four domains are evaluated: preservation and provenance, scholarly publishing, proof‐of‐useful‐work (PoUW), and NFTs and cultural value. Bringing these strands together, the study outlines pathways towards a decentralised humanities ecosystem that augments existing practice. Selective pilot projects, community‐driven standards, and federated governance emerge as pragmatic steps to harness blockchain's strengths—immutability, transparency, and distributed trust—while mitigating environmental impact, cost, and exclusion. The paper thus frames blockchain as a contingent tool whose scholarly value depends on careful, collaborative design.

Future HumanitiesVol. 4(1)
University College Cork (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.