Commercialisation and care sufficiency: the privatisation of children's homes in England

Although the commercialisation of care services is intended to produce markets that respond to care need, it is still unclear whether profit incentives align with population need. In this Health Policy, we examine the provision of the children's residential care market in England and whether it responds effectively to geographical need. We analysed comprehensive data on all children's homes in England between 2014 and 2023 and categorised providers as Local Authority, third sector, investment owned, individual owned, or corporate owned. We operationalised area need through net loss measures: the difference between the number of children placed outside a Local Authority versus those placed within it. Using Bayesian hierarchical models, we assessed the relationships between area characteristics, children's home locations, and ownership structures. In 2023, 852 (29·8%) of 2861 children's homes in England were owned by investment firms, doubling the number they ran in 2014 (414 of 1350 homes). All for-profit homes disproportionately located in areas of low need and investment-owned homes located more in areas with low house prices. Compared with Local Authority homes, investment-owned homes were less likely to operate in areas of high need and non-commercial homes were most likely to open in areas of high need. The commercialisation of children's social care provision has corresponded with less accessible services, contributing to sufficiency issues. Current market dynamics fail to address, and likely worsen, geographical disparities in children's residential care provision.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-12-11
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commercialisation and care sufficiency: the privatisation of children's homes in England

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Commercialisation and care sufficiency: the privatisation of children's homes in England

article en

Abstract

Although the commercialisation of care services is intended to produce markets that respond to care need, it is still unclear whether profit incentives align with population need. In this Health Policy, we examine the provision of the children's residential care market in England and whether it responds effectively to geographical need. We analysed comprehensive data on all children's homes in England between 2014 and 2023 and categorised providers as Local Authority, third sector, investment owned, individual owned, or corporate owned. We operationalised area need through net loss measures: the difference between the number of children placed outside a Local Authority versus those placed within it. Using Bayesian hierarchical models, we assessed the relationships between area characteristics, children's home locations, and ownership structures. In 2023, 852 (29·8%) of 2861 children's homes in England were owned by investment firms, doubling the number they ran in 2014 (414 of 1350 homes). All for-profit homes disproportionately located in areas of low need and investment-owned homes located more in areas with low house prices. Compared with Local Authority homes, investment-owned homes were less likely to operate in areas of high need and non-commercial homes were most likely to open in areas of high need. The commercialisation of children's social care provision has corresponded with less accessible services, contributing to sufficiency issues. Current market dynamics fail to address, and likely worsen, geographical disparities in children's residential care provision.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.