Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Continuous Rotary and Reciprocating Systems to Remove Gutta-Percha and an Epoxy-based Sealer from Root Canals Using CBCT: An in Vitro Study

Abstract Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of four different continuous rotary and reciprocating retreatment systems—ProTaper Universal Retreatment, HyFlex Remover, WaveOne Gold, and Mtwo Retreatment files—in removing gutta-percha and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) from root canal walls, using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for volumetric analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with fully formed apices were selected, instrumented using ProTaper Gold rotary files, and obturated with AH Plus sealer and ProTaper gutta-percha (F3 size) using the single-cone technique. Following a one-month incubation period at 37°C, specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=15) and retreated using the designated systems. Pre- and post-retreatment CBCT scans were performed to evaluate the volume of residual filling material. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc tests, and paired t-tests (p < 0.05). Results: All systems demonstrated significant reduction in obturation material (p < 0.001), but none achieved complete removal. HyFlex Remover exhibited the lowest mean residual volume (5.76 ± 0.67 mm³), followed closely by ProTaper Universal (5.81 ± 0.37 mm³) and Mtwo (6.92 ± 0.50 mm³). WaveOne Gold showed the highest residual volume (7.51 ± 0.88 mm³), indicating the least efficacy. The differences among the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this CBCT-based in vitro study, HyFlex Remover was found to be the most effective system for removing gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, while WaveOne Gold was the least effective. The performance of each system is influenced by factors such as file design, metallurgy, and motion dynamics. Complete removal remains a challenge, especially when epoxy resin-based sealers are used, emphasizing the need for continued advancements in retreatment strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948710
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Continuous Rotary and Reciprocating Systems to Remove Gutta-Percha and an Epoxy-based Sealer from Root Canals Using CBCT: An in Vitro Study

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Continuous Rotary and Reciprocating Systems to Remove Gutta-Percha and an Epoxy-based Sealer from Root Canals Using CBCT: An in Vitro Study

article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of four different continuous rotary and reciprocating retreatment systems—ProTaper Universal Retreatment, HyFlex Remover, WaveOne Gold, and Mtwo Retreatment files—in removing gutta-percha and epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) from root canal walls, using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for volumetric analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars with fully formed apices were selected, instrumented using ProTaper Gold rotary files, and obturated with AH Plus sealer and ProTaper gutta-percha (F3 size) using the single-cone technique. Following a one-month incubation period at 37°C, specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=15) and retreated using the designated systems. Pre- and post-retreatment CBCT scans were performed to evaluate the volume of residual filling material. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc tests, and paired t-tests (p < 0.05). Results: All systems demonstrated significant reduction in obturation material (p < 0.001), but none achieved complete removal. HyFlex Remover exhibited the lowest mean residual volume (5.76 ± 0.67 mm³), followed closely by ProTaper Universal (5.81 ± 0.37 mm³) and Mtwo (6.92 ± 0.50 mm³). WaveOne Gold showed the highest residual volume (7.51 ± 0.88 mm³), indicating the least efficacy. The differences among the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this CBCT-based in vitro study, HyFlex Remover was found to be the most effective system for removing gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, while WaveOne Gold was the least effective. The performance of each system is influenced by factors such as file design, metallurgy, and motion dynamics. Complete removal remains a challenge, especially when epoxy resin-based sealers are used, emphasizing the need for continued advancements in retreatment strategies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Association for Dental Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.