The Promise and Peril of Mental Health Apps

Can mental health apps be a tool in tackling the declining mental health in the United States and around the globe? Our review of the literature shows that mental health apps can improve symptoms of some disorders, such as depression and anxiety, when compared to no treatment. Such evidence of efficacy, however, is lacking in populations that are underserved by existing mental health services, including youth, seniors, men, and racial minorities. Additionally, a large number of apps claim to be evidence-based without any publicly available peer-reviewed evidence. This unregulated marketplace risks misleading consumers and exacerbating health disparities. We propose multi-level policy solutions, including oversight by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), voluntary adoption of scientific disclosure standards by app stores, and the creation of accessible, AI-enhanced databases to help consumers identify validated tools. Mental health apps promise to expand access to care, but without stronger evidence and regulation, they may deepen—rather than bridge—the mental health treatment divide.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23727322251405255
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Promise and Peril of Mental Health Apps

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

The Promise and Peril of Mental Health Apps

article en

Abstract

Can mental health apps be a tool in tackling the declining mental health in the United States and around the globe? Our review of the literature shows that mental health apps can improve symptoms of some disorders, such as depression and anxiety, when compared to no treatment. Such evidence of efficacy, however, is lacking in populations that are underserved by existing mental health services, including youth, seniors, men, and racial minorities. Additionally, a large number of apps claim to be evidence-based without any publicly available peer-reviewed evidence. This unregulated marketplace risks misleading consumers and exacerbating health disparities. We propose multi-level policy solutions, including oversight by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), voluntary adoption of scientific disclosure standards by app stores, and the creation of accessible, AI-enhanced databases to help consumers identify validated tools. Mental health apps promise to expand access to care, but without stronger evidence and regulation, they may deepen—rather than bridge—the mental health treatment divide.

Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain SciencesVol. 13(1)
Georgetown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.