Quantification of fracture porosity and reservoir heterogeneity in carbonates: An integrated core-log zoning workflow, Southwest Iran

Porosity estimation is a critical challenge in carbonate reservoir characterization due to complex pore systems and heterogeneity. This study compares core-derived and log-calculated porosity measurements in a carbonate reservoir in Southwest Iran at depths of 3250–3750 m, addressing industry challenges of data reliability and cost efficiency. While core analysis yields direct porosity measurements, its high cost and limited spatial coverage necessitate reliable log-based alternatives. The research utilized neutron, density, and acoustic logs to calculate porosity through established petrophysical relationships, comparing results with core data from 648 samples. Two innovative zoning approaches were developed: depth- and lithology-based zoning identified five distinct reservoir intervals, while porosity-based zoning classified the reservoir into three quality classes. Results show strong agreement between methods; log-derived mean porosity of 15 % closely matches the core measurement average of 12 %. Neutron-density logs effectively capture total porosity, while acoustic logs indicate primary porosity, enabling secondary porosity quantification. A key achievement is the implementation of Geolog software's deterministic and probabilistic methods to minimize interpretation subjectivity, reducing reliance on extensive coring while maintaining accuracy. The depth-based zoning approach identified high-quality reservoir intervals between 3450 and 3550 m with porosity exceeding 20 %. This work advances previous studies by offering: (1) a validated protocol for log-core integration in heterogeneous carbonates, (2) quantitative assessment of secondary porosity, and (3) practical zoning methodologies for reservoir quality prediction. Future research should focus on machine learning (ML) applications to enhance porosity prediction models and integrate advanced logging tools for improved fracture porosity characterization. • Log-core porosity match at 1.5 % MAE using novel depth-dependent correction for carbonate reservoirs. • Fracture Porosity Index (FPI) - First log-derived metric quantifying fracture impact on permeability. • Reservoir Quality Score (RQS) integrates porosity, fractures & shale to predict production zones. • Geolog software workflow reduces coring by 40 % while maintaining petrophysical data accuracy. • Zone 3 contains 20 % fracture porosity - Key high-productivity interval in heterogeneous carbonates.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Earth Sciences
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rines.2025.100149
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of fracture porosity and reservoir heterogeneity in carbonates: An integrated core-log zoning workflow, Southwest Iran

3 citations
Results in Earth Sciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
2.59
article

Quantification of fracture porosity and reservoir heterogeneity in carbonates: An integrated core-log zoning workflow, Southwest Iran

article en
3 citations

Abstract

Porosity estimation is a critical challenge in carbonate reservoir characterization due to complex pore systems and heterogeneity. This study compares core-derived and log-calculated porosity measurements in a carbonate reservoir in Southwest Iran at depths of 3250–3750 m, addressing industry challenges of data reliability and cost efficiency. While core analysis yields direct porosity measurements, its high cost and limited spatial coverage necessitate reliable log-based alternatives. The research utilized neutron, density, and acoustic logs to calculate porosity through established petrophysical relationships, comparing results with core data from 648 samples. Two innovative zoning approaches were developed: depth- and lithology-based zoning identified five distinct reservoir intervals, while porosity-based zoning classified the reservoir into three quality classes. Results show strong agreement between methods; log-derived mean porosity of 15 % closely matches the core measurement average of 12 %. Neutron-density logs effectively capture total porosity, while acoustic logs indicate primary porosity, enabling secondary porosity quantification. A key achievement is the implementation of Geolog software's deterministic and probabilistic methods to minimize interpretation subjectivity, reducing reliance on extensive coring while maintaining accuracy. The depth-based zoning approach identified high-quality reservoir intervals between 3450 and 3550 m with porosity exceeding 20 %. This work advances previous studies by offering: (1) a validated protocol for log-core integration in heterogeneous carbonates, (2) quantitative assessment of secondary porosity, and (3) practical zoning methodologies for reservoir quality prediction. Future research should focus on machine learning (ML) applications to enhance porosity prediction models and integrate advanced logging tools for improved fracture porosity characterization. • Log-core porosity match at 1.5 % MAE using novel depth-dependent correction for carbonate reservoirs. • Fracture Porosity Index (FPI) - First log-derived metric quantifying fracture impact on permeability. • Reservoir Quality Score (RQS) integrates porosity, fractures & shale to predict production zones. • Geolog software workflow reduces coring by 40 % while maintaining petrophysical data accuracy. • Zone 3 contains 20 % fracture porosity - Key high-productivity interval in heterogeneous carbonates.

Results in Earth SciencesVol. 4
National Iranian Oil Company (Iran) (IR), Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.