Using a food-energy nexus lens to explore people's experiences of the cooking journey in African informal settlements

Solid fuels are still used by over 3 billion people worldwide, including many residents of informal settlements. Most interventions designed to improve people's solid fuel-related health have failed or fallen short of their ambitions. Often, this is because implementers have not fully understood the contexts, cultures and behaviours of the places and people they are working within and with. To address this, our study used a food-energy nexus lens to explore people's experiences of the cooking journey, i.e., decision-making regarding which fuel to use, obtaining fuel and then cooking using that fuel. We videoed ‘go along’ interviews with residents of two African informal settlements during their cooking journeys. Interviews with 15 participants in Mukuru (Kenya) and 15 in Ndirande (Malawi) were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants' decision-making regarding fuel use was complex, dynamic (considering short-to-long timescales) and context-specific. Participants were aware of some of the household air pollution (and other solid fuel-related) health risks, though there were some misconceptions. The use of waste materials in solid fuel cooking – particularly during ignition – was common. The ‘cooking journey’ framing in this study highlighted the range of risks and challenges experienced across the food-energy nexus beyond household air pollution, including terrain, the built environment and gender-based violence. Broader approaches to understanding the contexts, cultures and behaviours of fuel users in informal settlements, such as our ‘cooking journey’ approach, can support better intervention design, and therefore enable progress towards sustainable development goal 7 - access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. • Fuel-based decision-making was complex, temporally dynamic and context-specific. • Risks and challenges at the food-energy nexus went beyond household air pollution. • The use of waste (including plastics) as fuel was common. • ‘Cooking journey’ framing enabled learning about contexts, cultures and behaviours.

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101914
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a food-energy nexus lens to explore people's experiences of the cooking journey in African informal settlements

Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Using a food-energy nexus lens to explore people's experiences of the cooking journey in African informal settlements

article en

Abstract

Solid fuels are still used by over 3 billion people worldwide, including many residents of informal settlements. Most interventions designed to improve people's solid fuel-related health have failed or fallen short of their ambitions. Often, this is because implementers have not fully understood the contexts, cultures and behaviours of the places and people they are working within and with. To address this, our study used a food-energy nexus lens to explore people's experiences of the cooking journey, i.e., decision-making regarding which fuel to use, obtaining fuel and then cooking using that fuel. We videoed ‘go along’ interviews with residents of two African informal settlements during their cooking journeys. Interviews with 15 participants in Mukuru (Kenya) and 15 in Ndirande (Malawi) were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants' decision-making regarding fuel use was complex, dynamic (considering short-to-long timescales) and context-specific. Participants were aware of some of the household air pollution (and other solid fuel-related) health risks, though there were some misconceptions. The use of waste materials in solid fuel cooking – particularly during ignition – was common. The ‘cooking journey’ framing in this study highlighted the range of risks and challenges experienced across the food-energy nexus beyond household air pollution, including terrain, the built environment and gender-based violence. Broader approaches to understanding the contexts, cultures and behaviours of fuel users in informal settlements, such as our ‘cooking journey’ approach, can support better intervention design, and therefore enable progress towards sustainable development goal 7 - access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. • Fuel-based decision-making was complex, temporally dynamic and context-specific. • Risks and challenges at the food-energy nexus went beyond household air pollution. • The use of waste (including plastics) as fuel was common. • ‘Cooking journey’ framing enabled learning about contexts, cultures and behaviours.

Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable developmentVol. 91
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.