Underdiagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: a narrative review of gender differences and systemic barriers

Purpose This paper examines the persistent underdiagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, particularly among women, adults and minority groups. This study aims to identify how gendered symptom expression, camouflaging behaviours, systemic barriers and cultural inequities affect diagnostic accuracy and timeliness. Design/methodology/approach A structured narrative review of 33 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2009 and 2024, with one historical paper from 1992 retained for context. Sources were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. We used controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Methodological quality was appraised with critical appraisal skills programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2. Reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Findings were synthesised across four domains: gender differences in diagnostic timing, camouflaging and phenotypic variability, systemic barriers and cultural and linguistic factors. Findings Standard diagnostic frameworks (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition, International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision) demonstrate limited sensitivity for atypical presentations, particularly among females and high-ability individuals. Delays are compounded by cultural and linguistic barriers, clinician knowledge gaps and fragmented services. Multimodal assessment and targeted clinician training are linked to better detection and greater equity. Research limitations/implications The included studies varied in methods and populations, which limits the generalisability of findings. Longitudinal and neurobiological evidence is scarce, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Future studies should validate culturally adapted screening tools and explore the neural basis of camouflaging. Practical implications Routine screening in primary care, clearer referral pathways, culturally adapted instruments and telehealth-enabled access may reduce diagnostic delays and disparities. Tailored clinician education may also improve early recognition and reduce misdiagnosis. Originality/value This review integrates gender, cultural and system-level perspectives on autism spectrum disorder underdiagnosis, offering actionable guidance for clinicians, educators and policymakers to support timely and equitable diagnosis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Autism
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aia-07-2025-0069
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underdiagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: a narrative review of gender differences and systemic barriers

Advances in Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Underdiagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: a narrative review of gender differences and systemic barriers

article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines the persistent underdiagnosis of autism spectrum disorder, particularly among women, adults and minority groups. This study aims to identify how gendered symptom expression, camouflaging behaviours, systemic barriers and cultural inequities affect diagnostic accuracy and timeliness. Design/methodology/approach A structured narrative review of 33 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2009 and 2024, with one historical paper from 1992 retained for context. Sources were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. We used controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Methodological quality was appraised with critical appraisal skills programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2. Reporting followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Findings were synthesised across four domains: gender differences in diagnostic timing, camouflaging and phenotypic variability, systemic barriers and cultural and linguistic factors. Findings Standard diagnostic frameworks (Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition, International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision) demonstrate limited sensitivity for atypical presentations, particularly among females and high-ability individuals. Delays are compounded by cultural and linguistic barriers, clinician knowledge gaps and fragmented services. Multimodal assessment and targeted clinician training are linked to better detection and greater equity. Research limitations/implications The included studies varied in methods and populations, which limits the generalisability of findings. Longitudinal and neurobiological evidence is scarce, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Future studies should validate culturally adapted screening tools and explore the neural basis of camouflaging. Practical implications Routine screening in primary care, clearer referral pathways, culturally adapted instruments and telehealth-enabled access may reduce diagnostic delays and disparities. Tailored clinician education may also improve early recognition and reduce misdiagnosis. Originality/value This review integrates gender, cultural and system-level perspectives on autism spectrum disorder underdiagnosis, offering actionable guidance for clinicians, educators and policymakers to support timely and equitable diagnosis.

Advances in AutismVol. 12(2)
Medical University of Lublin (PL), Jagiellonian University (PL), Radom College (PL), Ministry of the Interior (EE), 1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic (PL), School of Administration in Bielsko-Biala (PL), University of Bielsko-Biała (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.