Public-Private Partnerships in Home- and Community-Based Services for Older People in China: The Case of Guangzhou

Abstract This study examines public-private partnerships (PPPs) in home- and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults in Guangzhou, China, amid growing efforts to increase non-state actor participation and market mechanisms in welfare provision. Based on semi-structured interviews with non-state actors, this research examines both contractual and relational dimensions of PPPs and why achieving their full potential remains challenging. Findings reveal that state actors maintain a leading role in PPPs, with non-state actors primarily positioned as implementers of predefined welfare objectives. The power imbalance embedded in China’s sociopolitical context blurs the boundaries among the Party, state, and society, shaping coordination challenges in PPPs. These structural constraints hinder integrated service delivery and limit the extent to which PPPs can meaningfully leverage the expertise of various actors. This study enhances understanding of PPPs in China’s authoritarian, state-led market context and offers insights into the evolving landscape of welfare socialisation reforms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Society
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746425101255
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public-Private Partnerships in Home- and Community-Based Services for Older People in China: The Case of Guangzhou

Social Policy and Society
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Public-Private Partnerships in Home- and Community-Based Services for Older People in China: The Case of Guangzhou

article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines public-private partnerships (PPPs) in home- and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults in Guangzhou, China, amid growing efforts to increase non-state actor participation and market mechanisms in welfare provision. Based on semi-structured interviews with non-state actors, this research examines both contractual and relational dimensions of PPPs and why achieving their full potential remains challenging. Findings reveal that state actors maintain a leading role in PPPs, with non-state actors primarily positioned as implementers of predefined welfare objectives. The power imbalance embedded in China’s sociopolitical context blurs the boundaries among the Party, state, and society, shaping coordination challenges in PPPs. These structural constraints hinder integrated service delivery and limit the extent to which PPPs can meaningfully leverage the expertise of various actors. This study enhances understanding of PPPs in China’s authoritarian, state-led market context and offers insights into the evolving landscape of welfare socialisation reforms.

Social Policy and Society
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public-Private Partnerships in Home- and Community-Based Services for Older People in China: The Case of Guangzhou · Social Policy and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS