Remote train driving from the driver's perspective: insights and design considerations for future control stations

As the rail industry explores remote train operation, understanding the perspectives of train drivers is critical to designing effective remote-control stations. This study investigates how professional train drivers perceive remote train operation compared to traditional in-cab driving and identifies key design requirements for remote operator workstations. Using a mixed-methods approach, 15 licensed train drivers participated in experimental drives of a prototype train under both manual and remote-control conditions. Data was collected through questionnaires and interviews, followed by evaluation of two interface prototypes developed based on participant feedback. Results show that while drivers generally preferred in-cab operation due to better sensory feedback and situational awareness, many recognized the potential of remote operation, particularly if interfaces are ergonomically designed, visually clear, and adaptable to various operational contexts. The findings underscore the importance of human-centered design in developing remote operator workstations that support ergonomic comfort, sensory awareness, and operational efficiency. Simplicity, clarity, and functional relevance emerged as key interface priorities, alongside the need to accommodate differing operational needs between passenger and freight train drivers. These insights provide valuable guidance for the iterative development of safe and effective remote train control systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1662134
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote train driving from the driver's perspective: insights and design considerations for future control stations

Frontiers in Organizational Psychology
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Remote train driving from the driver's perspective: insights and design considerations for future control stations

article en

Abstract

As the rail industry explores remote train operation, understanding the perspectives of train drivers is critical to designing effective remote-control stations. This study investigates how professional train drivers perceive remote train operation compared to traditional in-cab driving and identifies key design requirements for remote operator workstations. Using a mixed-methods approach, 15 licensed train drivers participated in experimental drives of a prototype train under both manual and remote-control conditions. Data was collected through questionnaires and interviews, followed by evaluation of two interface prototypes developed based on participant feedback. Results show that while drivers generally preferred in-cab operation due to better sensory feedback and situational awareness, many recognized the potential of remote operation, particularly if interfaces are ergonomically designed, visually clear, and adaptable to various operational contexts. The findings underscore the importance of human-centered design in developing remote operator workstations that support ergonomic comfort, sensory awareness, and operational efficiency. Simplicity, clarity, and functional relevance emerged as key interface priorities, alongside the need to accommodate differing operational needs between passenger and freight train drivers. These insights provide valuable guidance for the iterative development of safe and effective remote train control systems.

Frontiers in Organizational PsychologyVol. 3
Linköping University (SE), Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (SE)
Linköpings Universitet
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.