Simplification in interpreting: the text classification of spoken and interpreted Chinese through ensemble learning techniques

Simplification is a feature of translation universals that has been extensively explored in translation studies. In relation to interpreting, however, recent studies have predominantly focused on a single level and on languages from the Indo-European family, which raises the question of whether the simplification hypothesis holds across different language levels and pairs. In this study, we investigate the simplification hypothesis by using the machine learning technique of ensemble learning to perform a classification experiment comparing interpreted and spoken Chinese. Specifically, we calculate the linguistic complexity borrowed from multiple disciplines, evaluate the characteristics of the two language modes, and apply ensemble learning for classification. We find that interpreted Chinese can be distinguished from spoken Chinese at lexical, syntactic, and combined levels, with classification accuracies of 89.39%, 98.94%, and 99.20%, respectively. However, our further finding that interpreted Chinese exhibits lexical simplification and syntactic complexification suggests a dynamic interplay between syntactic and lexical complexity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06382-7
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simplification in interpreting: the text classification of spoken and interpreted Chinese through ensemble learning techniques

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Simplification in interpreting: the text classification of spoken and interpreted Chinese through ensemble learning techniques

article en

Abstract

Simplification is a feature of translation universals that has been extensively explored in translation studies. In relation to interpreting, however, recent studies have predominantly focused on a single level and on languages from the Indo-European family, which raises the question of whether the simplification hypothesis holds across different language levels and pairs. In this study, we investigate the simplification hypothesis by using the machine learning technique of ensemble learning to perform a classification experiment comparing interpreted and spoken Chinese. Specifically, we calculate the linguistic complexity borrowed from multiple disciplines, evaluate the characteristics of the two language modes, and apply ensemble learning for classification. We find that interpreted Chinese can be distinguished from spoken Chinese at lexical, syntactic, and combined levels, with classification accuracies of 89.39%, 98.94%, and 99.20%, respectively. However, our further finding that interpreted Chinese exhibits lexical simplification and syntactic complexification suggests a dynamic interplay between syntactic and lexical complexity.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Zhejiang International Studies University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Shenzhen Technology University (CN), Beihang University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Simplification in interpreting: the text classification of spoken and interpreted Chinese through ensemble learning techniques · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS