Evaluating assessment practices in English programs: A study at Islamic higher education

This study examines the landscape of language assessment approaches within undergraduate English Education programs at Islamic higher education institutions. Employing a descriptive qualitative methodology grounded in a systematic literature-based analysis, the research outlines predominant trends, persistent challenges, and emergent opportunities in contemporary assessment practices. The findings indicate a continued dominance of traditional, summative assessment models, which persists despite national policy initiatives advocating for a paradigm shift toward formative, authentic, and technology-enhanced evaluation. Significant impediments to the adoption of these innovative approaches are identified, encompassing limited instructor assessment literacy, insufficient institutional support structures, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Conversely, the analysis notes a growing recognition of the potential inherent in digital assessment tools to transform pedagogical evaluation. In conclusion, the study proposes strategic recommendations, including targeted professional development for educators, systematic curricular reform, and the strategic integration of educational technology. These measures are suggested as essential for aligning assessment frameworks with the principles of communicative language teaching and the exigencies of 21st-century education. The implications of this research emphasize the necessity for systemic, context-sensitive reform to develop assessment models that more effectively foster language acquisition in the unique milieu of Islamic higher education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Englisia Journal of language education and humanities
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v13i1.32217
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating assessment practices in English programs: A study at Islamic higher education

Englisia Journal of language education and humanities
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Evaluating assessment practices in English programs: A study at Islamic higher education

article en

Abstract

This study examines the landscape of language assessment approaches within undergraduate English Education programs at Islamic higher education institutions. Employing a descriptive qualitative methodology grounded in a systematic literature-based analysis, the research outlines predominant trends, persistent challenges, and emergent opportunities in contemporary assessment practices. The findings indicate a continued dominance of traditional, summative assessment models, which persists despite national policy initiatives advocating for a paradigm shift toward formative, authentic, and technology-enhanced evaluation. Significant impediments to the adoption of these innovative approaches are identified, encompassing limited instructor assessment literacy, insufficient institutional support structures, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Conversely, the analysis notes a growing recognition of the potential inherent in digital assessment tools to transform pedagogical evaluation. In conclusion, the study proposes strategic recommendations, including targeted professional development for educators, systematic curricular reform, and the strategic integration of educational technology. These measures are suggested as essential for aligning assessment frameworks with the principles of communicative language teaching and the exigencies of 21st-century education. The implications of this research emphasize the necessity for systemic, context-sensitive reform to develop assessment models that more effectively foster language acquisition in the unique milieu of Islamic higher education.

Englisia Journal of language education and humanitiesVol. 13(1)
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.