Morality as performance: Studying the rise of performance measurement in citizen governance through the case of Chinese Social Credit System

In this paper, relying on a qualitative study of the Chinese Social Credit System (SCS), we explore how performance measurement is being mobilized to enact a moral regime to guide citizens’ behavior. Basing our analysis on governmentality studies in general but also studies of governmentality regimes in post-reform China, we conceptualize the techniques of government mobilized in SCS to normalize traditional civic value of trust (Chengxin) amalgamated with market value of creditworthiness. We discuss how under SCS, three visual regimes are at work, the Panoptic, the Synoptic and what we term the Alloptic. The first, the Panoptic gaze involves algorithmic and diffuse surveillance of citizens’ behavior backed by a regime of reward and punishment, the second, the Synoptic gaze (Mathiesen, 2004) is about making the stories and images of model citizens pervasively visible to all, and the third, what we term the ‘Alloptic’ gaze others the “untrustworthy” citizens under the shaming gaze of the mobile, unknown community shadowing them in their physical movements and online. We discuss how use of AI and Big Data enables such a coming together of the three gazes in a dynamic and highly uncertain nexus of visibility wherein the contours of the regime, and the purveyor of the shaming gaze are changing and unknown. We discuss the implications of our study for analysis of governance in other settings – especially considering the rise of authoritarianism in conjunction with new technologies or what has been termed “techno-fascism” particularly in the US, but also throughout the world.

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102837
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morality as performance: Studying the rise of performance measurement in citizen governance through the case of Chinese Social Credit System

Critical Perspectives on Accounting
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Morality as performance: Studying the rise of performance measurement in citizen governance through the case of Chinese Social Credit System

article en

Abstract

In this paper, relying on a qualitative study of the Chinese Social Credit System (SCS), we explore how performance measurement is being mobilized to enact a moral regime to guide citizens’ behavior. Basing our analysis on governmentality studies in general but also studies of governmentality regimes in post-reform China, we conceptualize the techniques of government mobilized in SCS to normalize traditional civic value of trust (Chengxin) amalgamated with market value of creditworthiness. We discuss how under SCS, three visual regimes are at work, the Panoptic, the Synoptic and what we term the Alloptic. The first, the Panoptic gaze involves algorithmic and diffuse surveillance of citizens’ behavior backed by a regime of reward and punishment, the second, the Synoptic gaze (Mathiesen, 2004) is about making the stories and images of model citizens pervasively visible to all, and the third, what we term the ‘Alloptic’ gaze others the “untrustworthy” citizens under the shaming gaze of the mobile, unknown community shadowing them in their physical movements and online. We discuss how use of AI and Big Data enables such a coming together of the three gazes in a dynamic and highly uncertain nexus of visibility wherein the contours of the regime, and the purveyor of the shaming gaze are changing and unknown. We discuss the implications of our study for analysis of governance in other settings – especially considering the rise of authoritarianism in conjunction with new technologies or what has been termed “techno-fascism” particularly in the US, but also throughout the world.

Critical Perspectives on AccountingVol. 103
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.