Effect of MEX Process Parameters on the Mechanical Response of PLA Structures for Orthopedic Applications

The advancement of polymeric materials for orthopedic applications has enabled the development of lightweight, adaptable structures that support patient-specific solutions. This study focuses on the design, fabrication, and mechanical characterization of additively manufactured (AM) polymeric polylactic acid (PLA) components produced via Material Extrusion (MEX), commonly known as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). By optimizing geometric configurations and process parameters, these structures demonstrate enhanced flexibility, energy absorption, and load distribution, making them well-suited for orthopedic products and assistive devices. A comprehensive mechanical testing campaign was conducted to evaluate the elasticity, ductility, and strength of FFF-fabricated samples under tensile and three-point bending loads. Key process parameters, including nozzle diameter, layer thickness, and printing orientation, were systematically varied, and their influence on mechanical performance was recorded. The results reveal that these parameters affect mechanical properties in a complex, interdependent manner. To better understand these relationships, an automated routine was developed to calculate the experimental mechanical response, specifically, stiffness and strength. This methodology enables an automated evaluation of the output, considering parameter ranges for future applications. The outcome of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the experimental investigation reveals that the printing orientation has a strong impact on the mechanical anisotropy in FFF, while layer thickness and nozzle diameter demonstrate moderate-to-weak importance. Thereafter, the experimental findings were applied on an innovative orthopedic wrist splint design to be fabricated by means of FFF. The most suitable mechanical properties were selected to test the mechanical response of the designed components under operational bending loading by means of linear elastic finite element (FE) analysis. The computational results indicated the importance of employing the actual mechanical properties derived from the applied printing process parameters compared to data sheet values. Hereby, an additional parameter to adjust the mechanical response is the product’s design topology. Finally, this framework lays the foundation for future training of neural networks to optimize specific mechanical responses, reducing reliance on conventional trial-and-error processes and improving the balance between orthopedic product quality and manufacturing efficiency.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9120414
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of MEX Process Parameters on the Mechanical Response of PLA Structures for Orthopedic Applications

1 citations
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Effect of MEX Process Parameters on the Mechanical Response of PLA Structures for Orthopedic Applications

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The advancement of polymeric materials for orthopedic applications has enabled the development of lightweight, adaptable structures that support patient-specific solutions. This study focuses on the design, fabrication, and mechanical characterization of additively manufactured (AM) polymeric polylactic acid (PLA) components produced via Material Extrusion (MEX), commonly known as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF). By optimizing geometric configurations and process parameters, these structures demonstrate enhanced flexibility, energy absorption, and load distribution, making them well-suited for orthopedic products and assistive devices. A comprehensive mechanical testing campaign was conducted to evaluate the elasticity, ductility, and strength of FFF-fabricated samples under tensile and three-point bending loads. Key process parameters, including nozzle diameter, layer thickness, and printing orientation, were systematically varied, and their influence on mechanical performance was recorded. The results reveal that these parameters affect mechanical properties in a complex, interdependent manner. To better understand these relationships, an automated routine was developed to calculate the experimental mechanical response, specifically, stiffness and strength. This methodology enables an automated evaluation of the output, considering parameter ranges for future applications. The outcome of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the experimental investigation reveals that the printing orientation has a strong impact on the mechanical anisotropy in FFF, while layer thickness and nozzle diameter demonstrate moderate-to-weak importance. Thereafter, the experimental findings were applied on an innovative orthopedic wrist splint design to be fabricated by means of FFF. The most suitable mechanical properties were selected to test the mechanical response of the designed components under operational bending loading by means of linear elastic finite element (FE) analysis. The computational results indicated the importance of employing the actual mechanical properties derived from the applied printing process parameters compared to data sheet values. Hereby, an additional parameter to adjust the mechanical response is the product’s design topology. Finally, this framework lays the foundation for future training of neural networks to optimize specific mechanical responses, reducing reliance on conventional trial-and-error processes and improving the balance between orthopedic product quality and manufacturing efficiency.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 9(12)
University of Nicosia (CY), Frederick University (CY)
Research and Innovation Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.