Identifying climate‐change refugia for species management and conservation in the Pacific Northwest

Abstract The impacts of climate change are already affecting many species and habitats, presenting challenges for species management and conservation. Protecting climate refugia—areas buffered from climate shifts where species can persist despite broader changes—has been proposed as a tool for managing species under climate change. Although many studies have mapped climate refugia, few have identified them for specific species at scales relevant to local management. To address this gap, we identified potential climate refugia for seven species of concern in the Pacific Northwestern United States: Cascade torrent salamander ( Rhyacotriton cascadae ), Rocky Mountain tailed frog ( Ascaphus montanus ), coastal tailed frog ( Ascaphus truei ), Greater Sage‐grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ), pygmy rabbit ( Brachylagus idahoensis ), fisher ( Pekania pennanti ), and White‐headed Woodpecker ( Leuconotopicus albolarvatus ). Collaborating with managers and species experts, we identified key factors influencing refugia locations and integrated multiple spatial data layers to map potential refugia for each species. For the three aquatic species, potential refugia included streams with cooler current and projected future temperatures, sustained future streamflow, and watersheds with greater canopy cover and cool valley bottoms. For the terrestrial species, refugia were linked to fire risk, ecological transformations, range shifts, soil moisture, and topographic complexity. Identifying potential refugia can guide conservation by prioritizing areas for protection and management. Sites with high‐quality habitat but limited refugia potential could become conservation priorities if habitat quality declines, whereas lower‐quality sites with greater refugia potential may warrant further protection. Areas with poor refugia potential may benefit from management actions to enhance resilience. Although expanding this approach to all species of concern would be valuable, it remains resource intensive. We conclude with recommendations for improving the efficiency of refugia identification in future studies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying climate‐change refugia for species management and conservation in the Pacific Northwest

1 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Species Distribution and Climate Change
1.84
article

Identifying climate‐change refugia for species management and conservation in the Pacific Northwest

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The impacts of climate change are already affecting many species and habitats, presenting challenges for species management and conservation. Protecting climate refugia—areas buffered from climate shifts where species can persist despite broader changes—has been proposed as a tool for managing species under climate change. Although many studies have mapped climate refugia, few have identified them for specific species at scales relevant to local management. To address this gap, we identified potential climate refugia for seven species of concern in the Pacific Northwestern United States: Cascade torrent salamander ( Rhyacotriton cascadae ), Rocky Mountain tailed frog ( Ascaphus montanus ), coastal tailed frog ( Ascaphus truei ), Greater Sage‐grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ), pygmy rabbit ( Brachylagus idahoensis ), fisher ( Pekania pennanti ), and White‐headed Woodpecker ( Leuconotopicus albolarvatus ). Collaborating with managers and species experts, we identified key factors influencing refugia locations and integrated multiple spatial data layers to map potential refugia for each species. For the three aquatic species, potential refugia included streams with cooler current and projected future temperatures, sustained future streamflow, and watersheds with greater canopy cover and cool valley bottoms. For the terrestrial species, refugia were linked to fire risk, ecological transformations, range shifts, soil moisture, and topographic complexity. Identifying potential refugia can guide conservation by prioritizing areas for protection and management. Sites with high‐quality habitat but limited refugia potential could become conservation priorities if habitat quality declines, whereas lower‐quality sites with greater refugia potential may warrant further protection. Areas with poor refugia potential may benefit from management actions to enhance resilience. Although expanding this approach to all species of concern would be valuable, it remains resource intensive. We conclude with recommendations for improving the efficiency of refugia identification in future studies.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 8(1)
Idaho Department of Fish and Game (US), University of Washington (US), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.