Identifiability and Observability Analysis for Epidemiological Models: Insights on the SIRS Model

ABSTRACT The problems of observability and identifiability have been of great interest as previous steps to estimating parameters and initial conditions of dynamical systems to which some known data (observations) are associated. While most works focus on linear and polynomial/rational systems of ODEs, general nonlinear systems, including non‐analytic systems have received far less attention and, to the best of our knowledge, no unified constructive methodology has been proposed to assess and guarantee parameter and state recoverability in this setting. Some symbolic tools provide automated analyses for rational or nonlinear, analytical systems, offering qualitative identifiability and observability verdicts that are sometimes incomplete. In this work, we introduce a family of efficient and fully constructive procedures that can enable explicit recovery of the unknown parameters and/or initial conditions, whenever possible, for a large class, not necessarily rational or analytic, nonlinear ODE systems. Each procedure is tailored to different observational scenarios and based on the resolution of linear systems. As a case study, we apply these procedures to several epidemic models, with a detailed focus on the SIRS model, demonstrating its joint observability‐identifiability when only a portion of the infected individuals is measured, a scenario that has not been studied before. In contrast, for the same observations, the SIR model is observable and identifiable, but not jointly observable‐identifiable. This distinction allows us to introduce a novel approach to discriminating between different epidemiological models (SIR vs. SIRS) from short‐time data. For these two models, we illustrate the theoretical results through some numerical experiments, validating the approach and highlighting its practical applicability to real‐world scenarios.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.70444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifiability and Observability Analysis for Epidemiological Models: Insights on the SIRS Model

1 citations
Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
2.63
article

Identifiability and Observability Analysis for Epidemiological Models: Insights on the SIRS Model

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The problems of observability and identifiability have been of great interest as previous steps to estimating parameters and initial conditions of dynamical systems to which some known data (observations) are associated. While most works focus on linear and polynomial/rational systems of ODEs, general nonlinear systems, including non‐analytic systems have received far less attention and, to the best of our knowledge, no unified constructive methodology has been proposed to assess and guarantee parameter and state recoverability in this setting. Some symbolic tools provide automated analyses for rational or nonlinear, analytical systems, offering qualitative identifiability and observability verdicts that are sometimes incomplete. In this work, we introduce a family of efficient and fully constructive procedures that can enable explicit recovery of the unknown parameters and/or initial conditions, whenever possible, for a large class, not necessarily rational or analytic, nonlinear ODE systems. Each procedure is tailored to different observational scenarios and based on the resolution of linear systems. As a case study, we apply these procedures to several epidemic models, with a detailed focus on the SIRS model, demonstrating its joint observability‐identifiability when only a portion of the infected individuals is measured, a scenario that has not been studied before. In contrast, for the same observations, the SIR model is observable and identifiable, but not jointly observable‐identifiable. This distinction allows us to introduce a novel approach to discriminating between different epidemiological models (SIR vs. SIRS) from short‐time data. For these two models, we illustrate the theoretical results through some numerical experiments, validating the approach and highlighting its practical applicability to real‐world scenarios.

Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Szeged (HU), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Mathématiques, Informatique et Statistique pour l'Environnement et l'Agronomie (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.