The importance of nutritional nudges in restaurant food environments: Insights from two contrasting countries

Restaurant food choices result from interactions between individual preferences and establishments' food environments. Different ecological-based strategies (nutritional nudges) have been suggested to push restaurant consumers toward healthier choices. This research analyzed key nutritional nudges from the restaurant and consumer perspectives and how they may differ. The study examined thirty-five nudges classified into three categories: 1) Decision Structure Nudges (DSNs: e.g., available menu items) ( n = 21), 2) Decision Information Nudges (DINs: e.g., menu labeling) ( n = 7), and 3) Decision Assistance Nudges (DANs: e.g., smaller portions with a lower price) (n = 7). Two comparative studies were conducted in two contrasting countries (Colombia and the U.S.) to identify the restaurant industry's prevalence of nutritional nudges adoption in health-focused and other-focused restaurants (HFRs and OFRs) and consumers' perceived importance of those nudges. Study 1 ( n = 127 restaurant observations) showed that restaurants' adoption of DSNs was higher than DINs and DANs. Differentiation in adopting nudges between HFRs and OFRs was identified in both countries. Colombian HFRs adopted significantly more DSNs than U.S. HFRs. Study 2 ( n = 819 consumer responses) found that DANs are relevant for consumers when selecting a restaurant. For U.S. consumers, DANs are significantly more important than DSNs. For Colombian consumers, DANs are as important as DSNs and are more important than DINs. When comparing the two studies, differences between restaurants' adoption and consumers' perceived importance were evident. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the potential of nudges like DANs to encourage healthy food consumption given their importance across various contexts. • Differences between restaurants' adoption and consumers' perceived importance of nutritional nudges were discovered. • This study emphasizes the potential of nudges like Decision Assistance Nudges to encourage healthy food consumption. • Clear differences in how health-focused restaurants and other-focused restaurants adopt nutritional nudges were observed.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105843
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The importance of nutritional nudges in restaurant food environments: Insights from two contrasting countries

Food Quality and Preference
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The importance of nutritional nudges in restaurant food environments: Insights from two contrasting countries

article en

Abstract

Restaurant food choices result from interactions between individual preferences and establishments' food environments. Different ecological-based strategies (nutritional nudges) have been suggested to push restaurant consumers toward healthier choices. This research analyzed key nutritional nudges from the restaurant and consumer perspectives and how they may differ. The study examined thirty-five nudges classified into three categories: 1) Decision Structure Nudges (DSNs: e.g., available menu items) ( n = 21), 2) Decision Information Nudges (DINs: e.g., menu labeling) ( n = 7), and 3) Decision Assistance Nudges (DANs: e.g., smaller portions with a lower price) (n = 7). Two comparative studies were conducted in two contrasting countries (Colombia and the U.S.) to identify the restaurant industry's prevalence of nutritional nudges adoption in health-focused and other-focused restaurants (HFRs and OFRs) and consumers' perceived importance of those nudges. Study 1 ( n = 127 restaurant observations) showed that restaurants' adoption of DSNs was higher than DINs and DANs. Differentiation in adopting nudges between HFRs and OFRs was identified in both countries. Colombian HFRs adopted significantly more DSNs than U.S. HFRs. Study 2 ( n = 819 consumer responses) found that DANs are relevant for consumers when selecting a restaurant. For U.S. consumers, DANs are significantly more important than DSNs. For Colombian consumers, DANs are as important as DSNs and are more important than DINs. When comparing the two studies, differences between restaurants' adoption and consumers' perceived importance were evident. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the potential of nudges like DANs to encourage healthy food consumption given their importance across various contexts. • Differences between restaurants' adoption and consumers' perceived importance of nutritional nudges were discovered. • This study emphasizes the potential of nudges like Decision Assistance Nudges to encourage healthy food consumption. • Clear differences in how health-focused restaurants and other-focused restaurants adopt nutritional nudges were observed.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 138
Kent State University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), Universidad de Medellín (CO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.