Information management during a complex meta-analysis: A practical guide for organizing data extraction.

Information management is a key part of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses clearly summarizes essential steps during the meta-analytic project and their reporting. Preparing for data extraction is generally suggested to be done at the stage of the protocol. However, in complex projects that aim to synthesize data from studies performed over a long time period or with a wide variability in study protocols, it is often impossible to fully account for all variations in data presentation before completing the full text screening. Here, we describe a protocol to methodically consider different aspects of the selected studies in order to update the data extraction template for the meta-analytic portion of the project. The protocol incorporates a process of identifying and removing non-compatible studies prior to the extraction of study-level outcomes, which is important for avoiding a potential confirmation bias. Using this protocol in combination with a pre-established data coding scheme simplifies data extraction and informs the subsequent meta-analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
McGill Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v22i1.1040
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information management during a complex meta-analysis: A practical guide for organizing data extraction.

McGill Journal of Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Information management during a complex meta-analysis: A practical guide for organizing data extraction.

article en

Abstract

Information management is a key part of conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses clearly summarizes essential steps during the meta-analytic project and their reporting. Preparing for data extraction is generally suggested to be done at the stage of the protocol. However, in complex projects that aim to synthesize data from studies performed over a long time period or with a wide variability in study protocols, it is often impossible to fully account for all variations in data presentation before completing the full text screening. Here, we describe a protocol to methodically consider different aspects of the selected studies in order to update the data extraction template for the meta-analytic portion of the project. The protocol incorporates a process of identifying and removing non-compatible studies prior to the extraction of study-level outcomes, which is important for avoiding a potential confirmation bias. Using this protocol in combination with a pre-established data coding scheme simplifies data extraction and informs the subsequent meta-analysis.

McGill Journal of MedicineVol. 22(1)
McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.