‘Justice’ and Access for Whom? A Critique of Online Men’s Behaviour Change Programs

Domestic and Family violence (DFV) is a global issue that significantly impacts individuals and communities. Decades of research, policy and service provision have attempted to prevent DFV, yet the prevalence of DFV remains high in Australia and internationally. Recent service development has focused on perpetrators of DFV via targeted perpetrator intervention programs commonly referred to as Domestic and Family Violence Perpetrator Programs (DFVPP). DFVPP create justice pathways for both people who use abusive behaviour, and the people impacted by abusive behaviour, by ensuring users of violence are held accountable for their behaviour and provided opportunities to address their behaviour, and victim survivors are validated in their experiences of abuse. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 Australian DFVPP were almost exclusively delivered in person, creating access barriers to justice pathways for users of violence in rural, regional and remote settings. The pandemic catalysed the development and implementation of online DFVPP. Consequently, there is a timely opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of online interventions for people who use violence. Online interventions have been presented as a panacea for the access barriers recognised for in-person DFVPP. Drawing on original empirical research, this article interrogates this claim. A qualitative research methodology was employed to interview program participants (n=6) and facilitators (n=11) in online perpetrator programs in NSW. Despite many and varied attempts to include victim survivors in the research, those voices were not captured which is a significant limitation of this study. Interview data was supplemented by quantitative program data regarding attendance and completion rates for online perpetrator programs. The combination of data provides insights about the access to justice pathways online programs provide, as well as the digital access barriers that remain, and the potential for online programs to create unjust outcomes for users of violence and victim survivors.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legalities
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/legal.2025.0103
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Justice’ and Access for Whom? A Critique of Online Men’s Behaviour Change Programs

Legalities
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

‘Justice’ and Access for Whom? A Critique of Online Men’s Behaviour Change Programs

article en

Abstract

Domestic and Family violence (DFV) is a global issue that significantly impacts individuals and communities. Decades of research, policy and service provision have attempted to prevent DFV, yet the prevalence of DFV remains high in Australia and internationally. Recent service development has focused on perpetrators of DFV via targeted perpetrator intervention programs commonly referred to as Domestic and Family Violence Perpetrator Programs (DFVPP). DFVPP create justice pathways for both people who use abusive behaviour, and the people impacted by abusive behaviour, by ensuring users of violence are held accountable for their behaviour and provided opportunities to address their behaviour, and victim survivors are validated in their experiences of abuse. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 Australian DFVPP were almost exclusively delivered in person, creating access barriers to justice pathways for users of violence in rural, regional and remote settings. The pandemic catalysed the development and implementation of online DFVPP. Consequently, there is a timely opportunity to evaluate the feasibility of online interventions for people who use violence. Online interventions have been presented as a panacea for the access barriers recognised for in-person DFVPP. Drawing on original empirical research, this article interrogates this claim. A qualitative research methodology was employed to interview program participants (n=6) and facilitators (n=11) in online perpetrator programs in NSW. Despite many and varied attempts to include victim survivors in the research, those voices were not captured which is a significant limitation of this study. Interview data was supplemented by quantitative program data regarding attendance and completion rates for online perpetrator programs. The combination of data provides insights about the access to justice pathways online programs provide, as well as the digital access barriers that remain, and the potential for online programs to create unjust outcomes for users of violence and victim survivors.

LegalitiesVol. 5(2)
Digital Science (United States) (US), User Interface Design (Germany) (DE), Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.