Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment

Standard ML models can modestly improve predictive accuracy but substantially worsen model interpretability in risk adjustment. Future research is needed to improve accuracy in these models while maintaining the interpretability essential for oversight of public spending.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy OPEN
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2025.100160
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment

Health Policy OPEN
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment

article en

Abstract

Standard ML models can modestly improve predictive accuracy but substantially worsen model interpretability in risk adjustment. Future research is needed to improve accuracy in these models while maintaining the interpretability essential for oversight of public spending.

Health Policy OPENVol. 10
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-sectional analysis of accuracy versus interpretability in Medicare Advantage risk adjustment · Health Policy OPEN (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS