Application of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Printing for Surgical Planning in Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: To evaluate and compare the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing technologies in preoperative planning for single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data: Accurate surgical planning is essential to restore spinal alignment and optimize outcomes in TLIF. While AI and 3D printing have been individually applied in spine surgery, limited studies have compared their predictive accuracy for key parameters such as cage height and postoperative alignment. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing single-level TLIF were included. An AI model trained on 311 lumbar x-rays was used to predict cage height and postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL). Separately, 3D-printed surgical planning models were created from CT-based 2D planning. The performance of the AI model during external validation and the performance of the 3D printing model were evaluated by calculating accuracy, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Due to the small sample size (n=20) and non-normal data distribution, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to compare the two methods. Results: The AI model achieved an RMSE of 3.28 mm and an MAE of 2.91 mm in cage height prediction. In contrast, the 3D printing approach showed superior accuracy with an RMSE of 0.59 mm and an MAE of 0.25 mm. For postoperative PI-LL prediction, 3D printing also outperformed AI, demonstrating lower RMSE and MAE values (2.62° and 2.02°, respectively). Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in PI-LL prediction between the models ( P =0.037), although no significant difference was found in cage height prediction ( P =0.249). Conclusions: The application of AI and 3D printing significantly enhances the precision of surgical planning in single-level TLIF, improving the selection of appropriate surgical interventions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Open
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000017
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Printing for Surgical Planning in Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Spine Open
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Application of Artificial Intelligence and 3D Printing for Surgical Planning in Single-level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

article en

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: To evaluate and compare the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) and 3D printing technologies in preoperative planning for single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Summary of Background Data: Accurate surgical planning is essential to restore spinal alignment and optimize outcomes in TLIF. While AI and 3D printing have been individually applied in spine surgery, limited studies have compared their predictive accuracy for key parameters such as cage height and postoperative alignment. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing single-level TLIF were included. An AI model trained on 311 lumbar x-rays was used to predict cage height and postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI–LL). Separately, 3D-printed surgical planning models were created from CT-based 2D planning. The performance of the AI model during external validation and the performance of the 3D printing model were evaluated by calculating accuracy, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Due to the small sample size (n=20) and non-normal data distribution, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to compare the two methods. Results: The AI model achieved an RMSE of 3.28 mm and an MAE of 2.91 mm in cage height prediction. In contrast, the 3D printing approach showed superior accuracy with an RMSE of 0.59 mm and an MAE of 0.25 mm. For postoperative PI-LL prediction, 3D printing also outperformed AI, demonstrating lower RMSE and MAE values (2.62° and 2.02°, respectively). Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in PI-LL prediction between the models ( P =0.037), although no significant difference was found in cage height prediction ( P =0.249). Conclusions: The application of AI and 3D printing significantly enhances the precision of surgical planning in single-level TLIF, improving the selection of appropriate surgical interventions.

Spine OpenVol. 1(2)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW), National Chung Hsing University (TW), Illinois College (US), Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Vietnam Military Medical University (VN), GenMont Biotech (Taiwan) (TW), Wan Fang Hospital (TW), Industrial Technology Research Institute (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.