CMC considerations on <i>in vivo</i> CAR-T

“In the rapidly evolving landscape of in vivo CAR-T cell therapies, viral-based approaches, such as those utilizing lentiviral vectors, offer robust integration and persistent CAR expression... Ex vivo CAR-T therapy requires weeks of manufacturing and release testing, resulting in high costs and prolonged vein-to-vein times. In vivo CAR-T eliminates patient-specific processing, making scalable vector production and CMC maturity the key bottleneck. Non-viral mRNA-LNP systems enable rapid, vaccine-like, fully synthetic manufacturing at commercial scale with lower costs, simpler QC, and enhanced safety due to transient expression without genomic integration. In contrast, lentiviral vectors provide durable CAR expression but face complex, expensive production, limited scalability, and extensive safety testing for replication-competent virus and insertional mutagenesis. Non-viral mRNA-LNP platforms currently offer superior manufacturability and faster clinical translation, while viral systems remain preferred when long-term efficacy is essential.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell and Gene Therapy Insights
Published
2025-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18609/cgti.2026.001
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CMC considerations on in vivo CAR-T

Cell and Gene Therapy Insights
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

CMC considerations on in vivo CAR-T

article en

Abstract

“In the rapidly evolving landscape of in vivo CAR-T cell therapies, viral-based approaches, such as those utilizing lentiviral vectors, offer robust integration and persistent CAR expression... Ex vivo CAR-T therapy requires weeks of manufacturing and release testing, resulting in high costs and prolonged vein-to-vein times. In vivo CAR-T eliminates patient-specific processing, making scalable vector production and CMC maturity the key bottleneck. Non-viral mRNA-LNP systems enable rapid, vaccine-like, fully synthetic manufacturing at commercial scale with lower costs, simpler QC, and enhanced safety due to transient expression without genomic integration. In contrast, lentiviral vectors provide durable CAR expression but face complex, expensive production, limited scalability, and extensive safety testing for replication-competent virus and insertional mutagenesis. Non-viral mRNA-LNP platforms currently offer superior manufacturability and faster clinical translation, while viral systems remain preferred when long-term efficacy is essential.

Cell and Gene Therapy InsightsVol. 12(1)
Analytical Services (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CMC considerations on <i>in vivo</i> CAR-T · Cell and Gene Therapy Insights (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS