A Mixed Methods Outcome Evaluation on Mixed Methods Research (MMR) Competencies

Mixed Methods Research (MMR) is growing rapidly, globally, and continues to develop across disciplines. A competency-based course design can better help develop mixed methods research scholars with competency-based learning outcomes. MMR-specific guidance, which informs meaningful design features for competency-based learning outcomes in graduate programs, has been scarce. The overarching aim of the study was to conduct a mixed methods evaluation of an innovative MMR course among doctoral students on MMR competency outcomes. This study examined five cohort groups of doctoral students enrolled in an MMR course during 2016–2020 (n=54) and provided a research-tested MMR tool that is sensitive to detect changes and easily administered. This MMR Competency Outcomes Measurement Tool (MMR-COMT) included a 15-item quantitative Mixed Methods Research Competency Scale (MMRCS_15), a 2-item MMR overall competency assessment (MMROV_2), and 3-item qualitative probing questions. The findings showed strong convergent evidence from both the significantly increased MMR learning objectives and competency scale scores quantitatively, as well as overwhelmingly positive qualitative quotes, convergently demonstrating the significant impact on MMR competencies. The current study contributes to the overall scholarship of the teaching and learning community with MMR-specific empirical studies, providing MMR competency measurement tool, as well as highlighting key course design features with students’ voices.

Publication Details

Journal
International journal on teaching and learning in higher education
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/1812-9129.1023
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Methods Outcome Evaluation on Mixed Methods Research (MMR) Competencies

International journal on teaching and learning in higher education
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

A Mixed Methods Outcome Evaluation on Mixed Methods Research (MMR) Competencies

article en

Abstract

Mixed Methods Research (MMR) is growing rapidly, globally, and continues to develop across disciplines. A competency-based course design can better help develop mixed methods research scholars with competency-based learning outcomes. MMR-specific guidance, which informs meaningful design features for competency-based learning outcomes in graduate programs, has been scarce. The overarching aim of the study was to conduct a mixed methods evaluation of an innovative MMR course among doctoral students on MMR competency outcomes. This study examined five cohort groups of doctoral students enrolled in an MMR course during 2016–2020 (n=54) and provided a research-tested MMR tool that is sensitive to detect changes and easily administered. This MMR Competency Outcomes Measurement Tool (MMR-COMT) included a 15-item quantitative Mixed Methods Research Competency Scale (MMRCS_15), a 2-item MMR overall competency assessment (MMROV_2), and 3-item qualitative probing questions. The findings showed strong convergent evidence from both the significantly increased MMR learning objectives and competency scale scores quantitatively, as well as overwhelmingly positive qualitative quotes, convergently demonstrating the significant impact on MMR competencies. The current study contributes to the overall scholarship of the teaching and learning community with MMR-specific empirical studies, providing MMR competency measurement tool, as well as highlighting key course design features with students’ voices.

International journal on teaching and learning in higher educationVol. 35(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.