Evaluation of composite restoration in class II cavities of primary molars using two different types of adhesive systems

Abstract Aim The purpose of the study was to evaluate composite filling after using two different types of bonding agents in class II cavities of primary molar teeth. Patients and methods Twenty children from both sexes aged from 5 to 9 years old were included in the study. The selected children were divided into two groups: group I: Seventh generation (Plafique bond) was used on one side. Group II: Eighth generation (Plafique universal bond) was used on the other side. Then restored with omnichroma composite resin material. Follow-up was carried out at 3, 6, and 9 months for clinical evaluation. Laboratory evaluation for human extracted molars was examined for microleakage. Results Clinically, it was revealed that there was no significant difference between retention of seventh and eighth generation at different follow-up periods, while regarding marginal integrity, there was a significant difference between both groups. While laboratory evaluation also showed that the dye penetration for marginal microleakage was significantly higher in group I than in group II. Conclusion Both the seventh and eighth generations of adhesive systems provide adequate retention for composite restorations in class II cavities of primary molars. However, the eighth generation dentin bonding agent demonstrated superior marginal integrity in both clinical and laboratory findings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tanta Dental Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_114_25
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of composite restoration in class II cavities of primary molars using two different types of adhesive systems

Tanta Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of composite restoration in class II cavities of primary molars using two different types of adhesive systems

article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim The purpose of the study was to evaluate composite filling after using two different types of bonding agents in class II cavities of primary molar teeth. Patients and methods Twenty children from both sexes aged from 5 to 9 years old were included in the study. The selected children were divided into two groups: group I: Seventh generation (Plafique bond) was used on one side. Group II: Eighth generation (Plafique universal bond) was used on the other side. Then restored with omnichroma composite resin material. Follow-up was carried out at 3, 6, and 9 months for clinical evaluation. Laboratory evaluation for human extracted molars was examined for microleakage. Results Clinically, it was revealed that there was no significant difference between retention of seventh and eighth generation at different follow-up periods, while regarding marginal integrity, there was a significant difference between both groups. While laboratory evaluation also showed that the dye penetration for marginal microleakage was significantly higher in group I than in group II. Conclusion Both the seventh and eighth generations of adhesive systems provide adequate retention for composite restorations in class II cavities of primary molars. However, the eighth generation dentin bonding agent demonstrated superior marginal integrity in both clinical and laboratory findings.

Tanta Dental JournalVol. 22(4)
Tanta University (EG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of composite restoration in class II cavities of primary molars using two different types of adhesive systems · Tanta Dental Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS