A Case Study of the Advent of Empirical Legal Studies in the Netherlands: The Narrow Pathway of Instrumentalism

This study examines how Empirical Legal Studies (ELS) gained a foothold in the Netherlands, particularly in the context of the country's long tradition of empirical socio-legal research. It is based on participatory observation and content analysis. It is argued that the way in which ELS has developed in the Netherlands fits into a much longer intellectual tradition in which the instrumental study of law is central. This tradition largely ignores alternative approaches, also prevalent in the Netherlands, in which the relationship between law and other normative systems ('legal pluralism') or between law and society is central. While these differences in the empirical study of law, which previously divided the Dutch L&S community to the bone, have become more or less invisible with the hospitable reception ELS has received from the L&S community, substantive differences remain. Bringing these differences back to the fore may help to avoid misunderstandings that arise from ignorance of the coexistence of different empirical approaches to the study of law and may facilitate the conscious choice of a particular approach.

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.6c032707
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Case Study of the Advent of Empirical Legal Studies in the Netherlands: The Narrow Pathway of Instrumentalism

CrimRxiv
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

A Case Study of the Advent of Empirical Legal Studies in the Netherlands: The Narrow Pathway of Instrumentalism

article en

Abstract

This study examines how Empirical Legal Studies (ELS) gained a foothold in the Netherlands, particularly in the context of the country's long tradition of empirical socio-legal research. It is based on participatory observation and content analysis. It is argued that the way in which ELS has developed in the Netherlands fits into a much longer intellectual tradition in which the instrumental study of law is central. This tradition largely ignores alternative approaches, also prevalent in the Netherlands, in which the relationship between law and other normative systems ('legal pluralism') or between law and society is central. While these differences in the empirical study of law, which previously divided the Dutch L&S community to the bone, have become more or less invisible with the hospitable reception ELS has received from the L&S community, substantive differences remain. Bringing these differences back to the fore may help to avoid misunderstandings that arise from ignorance of the coexistence of different empirical approaches to the study of law and may facilitate the conscious choice of a particular approach.

CrimRxiv
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.