A person as a subject of international public oversight (international oversight of the civil society of the United Nations)

This article is devoted to the analysis of the individual as a subject of international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations). The authors note that after World War II, the system of international law underwent fundamental changes, which was expressed in the creation of an international organization called the "United Nations," the adoption of its Charter, the cornerstone of which is the individual, their rights and freedoms, as well as the necessity of observing, safeguarding, and protecting the system of principles of international law. An important legal guarantee, on one hand, of these principles of international law, and on the other hand, of the system of rights and freedoms of individuals, is the institution of international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations), the subjects of which include, in particular: international non-governmental organizations (for example, international trade union organizations); the peoples of the United Nations; peoples and nations struggling for independence (self-determination); individuals. A number of research methods have been used in this work, such as: formal-logical; historical-legal; comparative-legal; method of analysis of specific legal situations; statistical; sociological. Individuals represent the most disputed type of subjects of the aforementioned oversight, as there is no consensus in domestic and foreign scientific literature regarding their international legal status and international legal personality. The paper analyzes the arguments of proponents and opponents of recognizing individuals as subjects of international law, as well as the arguments of scholars who classify individuals as a special type of subjects of international law or point out their contentious international legal status. The authors examine the mechanism of individuals' participation in international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations). An analysis is conducted of the main problems hindering optimal participation of individuals in this type of oversight, both concerning the activities, acts, and decisions of international governmental and non-governmental organizations, as well as regarding compliance with the procedure for using extraterritorial objects subordinate to international norms. A system of measures to resolve these issues is developed and substantiated.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Международное право
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2644-5514.2025.4.76837
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A person as a subject of international public oversight (international oversight of the civil society of the United Nations)

Международное право
International Law and Human Rights
article

A person as a subject of international public oversight (international oversight of the civil society of the United Nations)

article en

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of the individual as a subject of international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations). The authors note that after World War II, the system of international law underwent fundamental changes, which was expressed in the creation of an international organization called the "United Nations," the adoption of its Charter, the cornerstone of which is the individual, their rights and freedoms, as well as the necessity of observing, safeguarding, and protecting the system of principles of international law. An important legal guarantee, on one hand, of these principles of international law, and on the other hand, of the system of rights and freedoms of individuals, is the institution of international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations), the subjects of which include, in particular: international non-governmental organizations (for example, international trade union organizations); the peoples of the United Nations; peoples and nations struggling for independence (self-determination); individuals. A number of research methods have been used in this work, such as: formal-logical; historical-legal; comparative-legal; method of analysis of specific legal situations; statistical; sociological. Individuals represent the most disputed type of subjects of the aforementioned oversight, as there is no consensus in domestic and foreign scientific literature regarding their international legal status and international legal personality. The paper analyzes the arguments of proponents and opponents of recognizing individuals as subjects of international law, as well as the arguments of scholars who classify individuals as a special type of subjects of international law or point out their contentious international legal status. The authors examine the mechanism of individuals' participation in international public oversight (international civil society control of the United Nations). An analysis is conducted of the main problems hindering optimal participation of individuals in this type of oversight, both concerning the activities, acts, and decisions of international governmental and non-governmental organizations, as well as regarding compliance with the procedure for using extraterritorial objects subordinate to international norms. A system of measures to resolve these issues is developed and substantiated.

Международное право(4)
Kuban State University (RU), Kuban State Agrarian University (RU), Crimean State Engineering Pedagogical University (UA), Institute of Geology Ufa Scientific Center (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.