Does the removal of policy burdens promote the real economy orientation of SOEs

Based on data from A-share enterprises from 2011 to 2019, this paper uses the Lean and Heal Reform as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) method to investigate the impact of shedding policy burdens on the financialization of SOEs. The study finds that shedding policy burdens significantly reduces the proportion of financial asset allocation and the reliance on financial returns among SOEs, promoting their return to core business operations. The underlying mechanisms manifest through the curtailment of both speculative motives and earnings management motives. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the reform effect is more pronounced in regions with lower fiscal pressure, more developed factor markets, larger SOEs, and SOEs whose executives lack financial backgrounds. Further research shows that this reform not only mitigates the negative impact of financialization on corporate value but also optimizes the alignment between financial assets and actual demand. The study demonstrates that shedding policy burdens is a crucial pathway for SOEs to “shift from virtual to real” economy. Through institutional optimization, governance enhancement, and guidance on asset allocation, this reform can drive SOEs to refocus on building core competencies in their primary industries. These findings provide significant policy implications for advancing SOE reform and achieving high-quality development.

Publication Details

Journal
Zhongguo ruankexue
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/1005-0566.20250915
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the removal of policy burdens promote the real economy orientation of SOEs

Zhongguo ruankexue
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Does the removal of policy burdens promote the real economy orientation of SOEs

article en

Abstract

Based on data from A-share enterprises from 2011 to 2019, this paper uses the Lean and Heal Reform as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) method to investigate the impact of shedding policy burdens on the financialization of SOEs. The study finds that shedding policy burdens significantly reduces the proportion of financial asset allocation and the reliance on financial returns among SOEs, promoting their return to core business operations. The underlying mechanisms manifest through the curtailment of both speculative motives and earnings management motives. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the reform effect is more pronounced in regions with lower fiscal pressure, more developed factor markets, larger SOEs, and SOEs whose executives lack financial backgrounds. Further research shows that this reform not only mitigates the negative impact of financialization on corporate value but also optimizes the alignment between financial assets and actual demand. The study demonstrates that shedding policy burdens is a crucial pathway for SOEs to “shift from virtual to real” economy. Through institutional optimization, governance enhancement, and guidance on asset allocation, this reform can drive SOEs to refocus on building core competencies in their primary industries. These findings provide significant policy implications for advancing SOE reform and achieving high-quality development.

Zhongguo ruankexueVol. 40(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.