A round-robin study from 12 UK Fire Services on the fire safety of open-sided car parks: Is current guidance adequate?

Recent incidents such as the London Luton Airport Car Park fire, question the validity of current fire protection measures recommended in Approved Document B (ADB) Vol. 2. This research carried out a critical evaluation of a fire strategy for an open-sided car park (developed in accordance with ADB), in collaboration with the fire engineers/protection managers from 12 UK Fire Services. The fire strategy focuses on supporting life safety in an eight-storey car park with spaces for electric vehicles (EVs). This study focuses on five key areas: means of warning and escape (B1), internal fire spread (B2 and B3), external fire spread (B4), access for Fire Services (B5), and EV-related issues. Results demonstrate that nine out of 12 Fire Services suggested improvements to evacuation measures, especially for disabled persons, recommending an evacuation lift and calculating the occupancy based on car park usage. A significant concern was the structural fire resistance, with nine Fire Services recommending an increase in fire protection from 15 minutes to a longer period, due to perceived higher calorific value of modern vehicles, including EVs, and the possibility of prolonged evacuation and Fire Service attendance. Furthermore, 10 Fire Services suggested the need for automatic suppression systems, typically sprinklers, especially on the floor with EV charging points (EVCPs). Regarding B5, six Fire Services recommended improvements in firefighting infrastructure, in terms of water mains and hydrants provision. Moreover, safety concerns about EVs were raised by eight Fire Services, including power supply isolation, improved ventilation, and better spacing between vehicles to control the fire spread. This review highlights the need for revisiting current fire safety guidance due to evolving risks posed by modern vehicles, especially EVs, to ensure compliance with contemporary safety standards.

Publication Details

Journal
Edinburgh Research Explorer
Published
2025-06-30
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A round-robin study from 12 UK Fire Services on the fire safety of open-sided car parks: Is current guidance adequate?

Edinburgh Research Explorer
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

A round-robin study from 12 UK Fire Services on the fire safety of open-sided car parks: Is current guidance adequate?

article en

Abstract

Recent incidents such as the London Luton Airport Car Park fire, question the validity of current fire protection measures recommended in Approved Document B (ADB) Vol. 2. This research carried out a critical evaluation of a fire strategy for an open-sided car park (developed in accordance with ADB), in collaboration with the fire engineers/protection managers from 12 UK Fire Services. The fire strategy focuses on supporting life safety in an eight-storey car park with spaces for electric vehicles (EVs). This study focuses on five key areas: means of warning and escape (B1), internal fire spread (B2 and B3), external fire spread (B4), access for Fire Services (B5), and EV-related issues. Results demonstrate that nine out of 12 Fire Services suggested improvements to evacuation measures, especially for disabled persons, recommending an evacuation lift and calculating the occupancy based on car park usage. A significant concern was the structural fire resistance, with nine Fire Services recommending an increase in fire protection from 15 minutes to a longer period, due to perceived higher calorific value of modern vehicles, including EVs, and the possibility of prolonged evacuation and Fire Service attendance. Furthermore, 10 Fire Services suggested the need for automatic suppression systems, typically sprinklers, especially on the floor with EV charging points (EVCPs). Regarding B5, six Fire Services recommended improvements in firefighting infrastructure, in terms of water mains and hydrants provision. Moreover, safety concerns about EVs were raised by eight Fire Services, including power supply isolation, improved ventilation, and better spacing between vehicles to control the fire spread. This review highlights the need for revisiting current fire safety guidance due to evolving risks posed by modern vehicles, especially EVs, to ensure compliance with contemporary safety standards.

Edinburgh Research Explorer
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.