The Network Architecture of Anti-money Laundering:Strategic and Tactical (Dis)Connections in the UK’s Policy, Supervision, and Enforcement Landscape

This article explores the UK’s anti-money laundering (AML) regime using social network analysis to examine the structural and relational dynamics of organisations engaged in policy, enforcement and supervision. It identifies two distinct but interrelated dimensions: strategic and tactical. Some actors engage in both, but one type of relationship does not determine the other, implying functional specialisation. Specialisation allows tailored mechanisms but risks strategic aims failing to translate into action. We found a tendency towards homophily, with organisations collaborating with those sharing similar mentalities. Some try to bridge gaps but feel overwhelmed by the volume of information and actor multiplicity. This highlights the role of brokers. Yet inefficiencies remain. Reconfiguring the network may improve efficiency by reducing redundancy, promoting specialisation and strengthening brokerage.

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaf101/8368980
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Network Architecture of Anti-money Laundering:Strategic and Tactical (Dis)Connections in the UK’s Policy, Supervision, and Enforcement Landscape

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
article

The Network Architecture of Anti-money Laundering:Strategic and Tactical (Dis)Connections in the UK’s Policy, Supervision, and Enforcement Landscape

article en

Abstract

This article explores the UK’s anti-money laundering (AML) regime using social network analysis to examine the structural and relational dynamics of organisations engaged in policy, enforcement and supervision. It identifies two distinct but interrelated dimensions: strategic and tactical. Some actors engage in both, but one type of relationship does not determine the other, implying functional specialisation. Specialisation allows tailored mechanisms but risks strategic aims failing to translate into action. We found a tendency towards homophily, with organisations collaborating with those sharing similar mentalities. Some try to bridge gaps but feel overwhelmed by the volume of information and actor multiplicity. This highlights the role of brokers. Yet inefficiencies remain. Reconfiguring the network may improve efficiency by reducing redundancy, promoting specialisation and strengthening brokerage.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.