Scientific Misconduct in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Global South

ABSTRACT This study examines scientific misconduct in the Global South amid technological change and institutional pressures, proposing strategies to foster a sustainable culture of research integrity. Adopting a systematic review design guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) framework, this study ensures methodological rigour, transparency, and reproducibility of the findings. Relevant literature was retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria that yielded 60 eligible articles. These studies were critically synthesised using a six‐stage thematic analysis to identify regional patterns, drivers of misconduct, and effective mitigation strategies. Misconduct is shaped by structural, cultural, and technological factors, evolving from traditional unethical practices to AI‐enabled forms due to academic competition and weak governance. Drivers include personal pressures, poor oversight, inadequate mentorship, technological misuse, socio‐cultural tolerance of unethical norms, and limited national research policies. Recommended measures include prioritising research quality, establishing independent integrity offices, embedding ethics education, and fostering collaboration among governments, universities, and publishers. The study provides actionable guidance for policymakers and academic institutions to enhance governance, promote ethical awareness, and reduce misconduct. This research integrates technological, institutional, and socio‐cultural dimensions to advance understanding of integrity challenges in the Global South.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70097
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific Misconduct in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Global South

Higher Education Quarterly
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Scientific Misconduct in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Global South

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines scientific misconduct in the Global South amid technological change and institutional pressures, proposing strategies to foster a sustainable culture of research integrity. Adopting a systematic review design guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) framework, this study ensures methodological rigour, transparency, and reproducibility of the findings. Relevant literature was retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria that yielded 60 eligible articles. These studies were critically synthesised using a six‐stage thematic analysis to identify regional patterns, drivers of misconduct, and effective mitigation strategies. Misconduct is shaped by structural, cultural, and technological factors, evolving from traditional unethical practices to AI‐enabled forms due to academic competition and weak governance. Drivers include personal pressures, poor oversight, inadequate mentorship, technological misuse, socio‐cultural tolerance of unethical norms, and limited national research policies. Recommended measures include prioritising research quality, establishing independent integrity offices, embedding ethics education, and fostering collaboration among governments, universities, and publishers. The study provides actionable guidance for policymakers and academic institutions to enhance governance, promote ethical awareness, and reduce misconduct. This research integrates technological, institutional, and socio‐cultural dimensions to advance understanding of integrity challenges in the Global South.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 80(1)
Le Moyne College (US), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Scientific Misconduct in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Global South · Higher Education Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS