A Geometric Instrument for Measuring Interrogative Entropy in Language Systems v.03

Author’s Clarification on Prior VersionsNote: This clarification addresses language used in Versions 1 and 2 that may be ambiguous withrespect to prediction and behavioral influence. Version 3 provides corrected framing.In earlier versions of this work (v1 and v2), certain phrasings were ambiguous with respect toprediction, elicitation, and behavioral influence. That wording reflected an exploratory phase ofthe project and was not sufficiently precise about the limits of the instrument. As a result, somestatements can be reasonably read as implying predictive or causal power that the framework doesnot claim and does not support intrinsically.Below, I identify specific statements and clarify what was intended by them, without assertingthat the wording was correct or should be retained.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17931252
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Geometric Instrument for Measuring Interrogative Entropy in Language Systems v.03

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

A Geometric Instrument for Measuring Interrogative Entropy in Language Systems v.03

article en

Abstract

Author’s Clarification on Prior VersionsNote: This clarification addresses language used in Versions 1 and 2 that may be ambiguous withrespect to prediction and behavioral influence. Version 3 provides corrected framing.In earlier versions of this work (v1 and v2), certain phrasings were ambiguous with respect toprediction, elicitation, and behavioral influence. That wording reflected an exploratory phase ofthe project and was not sufficiently precise about the limits of the instrument. As a result, somestatements can be reasonably read as implying predictive or causal power that the framework doesnot claim and does not support intrinsically.Below, I identify specific statements and clarify what was intended by them, without assertingthat the wording was correct or should be retained.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.