An evolutionary game analysis of rural stock agricultural cooperatives development: Evidence from China

Abstract Rural stock cooperatives have emerged as a dominant organizational form in China's agricultural sector since the economic reforms, yet their governance mechanisms face persistent challenges. However, the behavioural dynamics between key stakeholders remain poorly understood. There is also a limited analysis of how institutional flaws contribute to cooperative instability. This study uses an evolutionary game model to analyse strategic interactions between the board and shareholders. It also employs a case study of grassroots cooperatives to root the theory in empirical reality. According to the model, we get four pure‐strategy evolutionarily stable strategies representing four different stages of cooperatives: the initial stage, the development stage, the bottleneck stage and the equilibrium stage. Further analysis reveals that ambiguous legal person status and weak financial governance in early‐stage cooperatives lead to developmental chaos. Later‐stage bottlenecks arise from asset misappropriation and opportunistic behaviour by boards, highlighting systemic risks in current management structures. The study underscores the necessity of professionalized management systems, including hiring trained managers, to ensure cooperative sustainability. These results provide theoretical support for designing incentive‐compatible governance in China's rural cooperatives.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.70033
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evolutionary game analysis of rural stock agricultural cooperatives development: Evidence from China

Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

An evolutionary game analysis of rural stock agricultural cooperatives development: Evidence from China

article en

Abstract

Abstract Rural stock cooperatives have emerged as a dominant organizational form in China's agricultural sector since the economic reforms, yet their governance mechanisms face persistent challenges. However, the behavioural dynamics between key stakeholders remain poorly understood. There is also a limited analysis of how institutional flaws contribute to cooperative instability. This study uses an evolutionary game model to analyse strategic interactions between the board and shareholders. It also employs a case study of grassroots cooperatives to root the theory in empirical reality. According to the model, we get four pure‐strategy evolutionarily stable strategies representing four different stages of cooperatives: the initial stage, the development stage, the bottleneck stage and the equilibrium stage. Further analysis reveals that ambiguous legal person status and weak financial governance in early‐stage cooperatives lead to developmental chaos. Later‐stage bottlenecks arise from asset misappropriation and opportunistic behaviour by boards, highlighting systemic risks in current management structures. The study underscores the necessity of professionalized management systems, including hiring trained managers, to ensure cooperative sustainability. These results provide theoretical support for designing incentive‐compatible governance in China's rural cooperatives.

Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.