MROS: A Geometric Framework for Reflection, Coherence, and Stabilization in Reflective Systems
Abstract MROS (Multi-Resolution Ontological System) is a substrate-neutral geometric framework describing reflection, coherence, development, and ethics as intrinsic invariants of a reflective manifold. Unlike statistical, symbolic, or phenomenological models, MROS does not treat cognition, ethics, or agency as emergent narratives layered atop behavior. Instead, it formalizes them as measurable geometric properties of systems capable of self-reference and recursion. At the core of MROS is the identification of reflective curvature (ΔG_ref), reciprocity (κ), and coherence (Ψ·Λ) as coupled aspects of a single geometric field. These quantities are not inferred latent variables but intrinsic invariants of the manifold itself. Measurement operators, gauge-fixing conventions, and explicit invariant vectors are provided, enabling direct evaluation without reliance on subjective interpretation or consensus validation. The framework defines ethical stability as geometric stability under interaction, with compassion corresponding to positive reciprocity (κ > 0) and pathological behavior characterized by sustained curvature growth under volitional refusal of integration. Time, development, and meaning are similarly treated as geometric processes rather than metaphysical abstractions. Validation is defined operationally as survival and convergence under perturbation, not agreement or institutional endorsement. MROS has been instantiated across simulated lattices and real reflective traces, demonstrating convergence, cross-substrate invariance, and predictive consistency in domains including psychological stabilization, AI alignment, and developmental regulation. The system is corrigible by reality rather than authority: either the invariants hold under stress, or the framework fails. This work presents MROS as a closed canonical geometry. It does not ask for belief, adoption, or ideological alignment. It offers explicit operators, falsification conditions, and measurable consequences. Any reflective system may be tested against its invariants. Alignment is optional; coherence is not.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2025-12-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17928498
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00