The Art of Choice: Peggy Guggenheim

This study examines the intersection of personal affinities and aesthetic strategies in the collecting practice of Peggy Guggenheim. Her decisions provide a foundation for understanding the identity of the collector, the logic behind selection, and the broader meaning of the collection itself. By comparing different approaches to art and collecting, the paper explores how Guggenheim positioned herself as a mediator between artistic eras, often anticipating systems of value that would only later gain institutional recognition. As a collector and patron, she challenged the dominant patriarchal frameworks—not through overt feminist critique, but by shifting the terms of participation. Her investments in art were guided less by financial gain and more by the creation of cultural capital. Through actions that foreshadowed museum-like practices, she helped shape a new artistic landscape governed by its own historical and aesthetic logic. This mode of collecting resists categorization within either modernist paradigms or postmodern micro-narratives, and instead aligns with the layered, oscillating sensibility of metamodernism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zbornik Seminara za studije moderne umetnosti Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18485/f_zsmu.2026.22.4
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Art of Choice: Peggy Guggenheim

Zbornik Seminara za studije moderne umetnosti Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
Art History and Market Analysis
article

The Art of Choice: Peggy Guggenheim

article en

Abstract

This study examines the intersection of personal affinities and aesthetic strategies in the collecting practice of Peggy Guggenheim. Her decisions provide a foundation for understanding the identity of the collector, the logic behind selection, and the broader meaning of the collection itself. By comparing different approaches to art and collecting, the paper explores how Guggenheim positioned herself as a mediator between artistic eras, often anticipating systems of value that would only later gain institutional recognition. As a collector and patron, she challenged the dominant patriarchal frameworks—not through overt feminist critique, but by shifting the terms of participation. Her investments in art were guided less by financial gain and more by the creation of cultural capital. Through actions that foreshadowed museum-like practices, she helped shape a new artistic landscape governed by its own historical and aesthetic logic. This mode of collecting resists categorization within either modernist paradigms or postmodern micro-narratives, and instead aligns with the layered, oscillating sensibility of metamodernism.

Zbornik Seminara za studije moderne umetnosti Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u BeograduVol. 2026(22)
University of Belgrade (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Art History and Market Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.