The Reliability and Validity of the Systemic Practice Scale

ABSTRACT Competency‐based training is thought to increase standards of therapist practice. The Systemic Practice Scale (SPS) has been developed to measure student competence in systemic therapy. Two studies were conducted to test the reliability and validity of this scale by using student data across three different UK training sites. Reliability was assessed by checking consistency in scoring across training sites and comparing data across year groups, with an expectation that competencies would improve over time. The factorial validity was assessed by examining the factor structure and internal consistency of the scale from data collected at one training site over seven years. The results of the studies indicate that the SPS holds construct validity, as student scores increased over time, and that the scale measures a single dominant construct. However, there was a difference in scoring across sites which linked to whether the SPS was used for assessment or feedback only.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Therapy
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.70015
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Reliability and Validity of the Systemic Practice Scale

Journal of Family Therapy
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

The Reliability and Validity of the Systemic Practice Scale

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Competency‐based training is thought to increase standards of therapist practice. The Systemic Practice Scale (SPS) has been developed to measure student competence in systemic therapy. Two studies were conducted to test the reliability and validity of this scale by using student data across three different UK training sites. Reliability was assessed by checking consistency in scoring across training sites and comparing data across year groups, with an expectation that competencies would improve over time. The factorial validity was assessed by examining the factor structure and internal consistency of the scale from data collected at one training site over seven years. The results of the studies indicate that the SPS holds construct validity, as student scores increased over time, and that the scale measures a single dominant construct. However, there was a difference in scoring across sites which linked to whether the SPS was used for assessment or feedback only.

Journal of Family TherapyVol. 48(1)
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Manchester (GB), Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.