For the History of the Texts of Slavia Christiana. Some Considerations

The author initially observes that most literary works of Church Slavonic literature written between 863 and the middle of the 11th century are as a rule handed down in manuscripts from the 14th century onwards when of South Slavic origin, and in manuscripts from the 15th century onwards when of East Slavic provenance. He then emphasizes that the method of significant errors allows interrelationship among textual witnesses to be established; he hints at some causes of perturbation – from the point of view of modern scholars – as contamination on the one hand, and corrections autonomously introduced by scribes on the other hand; and he concludes by stating that for the transmission of the literature of Slavia Christiana (as also of other literary traditions) the witnesses that were lost but can be reconstructed, and the extant ones depend on, are in fact more important than the latter.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studi Slavistici
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36253/studi_slavis-18374
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For the History of the Texts of Slavia Christiana. Some Considerations

Studi Slavistici
Byzantine Studies and History
article

For the History of the Texts of Slavia Christiana. Some Considerations

article en

Abstract

The author initially observes that most literary works of Church Slavonic literature written between 863 and the middle of the 11th century are as a rule handed down in manuscripts from the 14th century onwards when of South Slavic origin, and in manuscripts from the 15th century onwards when of East Slavic provenance. He then emphasizes that the method of significant errors allows interrelationship among textual witnesses to be established; he hints at some causes of perturbation – from the point of view of modern scholars – as contamination on the one hand, and corrections autonomously introduced by scribes on the other hand; and he concludes by stating that for the transmission of the literature of Slavia Christiana (as also of other literary traditions) the witnesses that were lost but can be reconstructed, and the extant ones depend on, are in fact more important than the latter.

Studi Slavistici
University of Udine (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.