AI knowledge readiness among university students: A cross-sectional quantitative study

Artificial intelligence is now part of many ordinary routines, often in ways that people barely notice, and it has started to find its way into university work as well. For students, this means that some familiarity with AI is becoming less of an advantage and more of an expectation. Much of this comes down to knowing enough about AI to use it sensibly in their studies, or at least not feeling lost when it appears in academic tasks. In this study, that basic level of knowledge – enough to work with AI without relying on it blindly – is taken as the starting point for the study of AI readiness. The investigation centres on students in the English for Professionals programme, which is an applied-linguistics degree. The study looks at how prepared these students feel to handle AI in the course of their academic work. Using a cross-sectional design, 291 students from different academic years completed a structured questionnaire measuring four dimensions of AI readiness: cognition, ability, vision, and ethics. The results show that AI readiness generally increases with academic progression, with second- and third-year students reporting higher levels of ability, cognition, and vision. The ethics dimension, however, remains low across all groups. Gender differences were minimal. The findings indicate a need for earlier inclusion of AI-related material and a more sustained focus on AI ethics in the applied linguistics curriculum. More broadly, the programme requires considerable revision to incorporate computational linguistics and AI-related topics, ensuring that applied linguistics students leave with the level of preparation now expected in professional contexts where AI routinely plays a role.

Publication Details

Journal
Training Language and Culture
Published
2025-12-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2025-9-4-112-129
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI knowledge readiness among university students: A cross-sectional quantitative study

Training Language and Culture
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI knowledge readiness among university students: A cross-sectional quantitative study

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is now part of many ordinary routines, often in ways that people barely notice, and it has started to find its way into university work as well. For students, this means that some familiarity with AI is becoming less of an advantage and more of an expectation. Much of this comes down to knowing enough about AI to use it sensibly in their studies, or at least not feeling lost when it appears in academic tasks. In this study, that basic level of knowledge – enough to work with AI without relying on it blindly – is taken as the starting point for the study of AI readiness. The investigation centres on students in the English for Professionals programme, which is an applied-linguistics degree. The study looks at how prepared these students feel to handle AI in the course of their academic work. Using a cross-sectional design, 291 students from different academic years completed a structured questionnaire measuring four dimensions of AI readiness: cognition, ability, vision, and ethics. The results show that AI readiness generally increases with academic progression, with second- and third-year students reporting higher levels of ability, cognition, and vision. The ethics dimension, however, remains low across all groups. Gender differences were minimal. The findings indicate a need for earlier inclusion of AI-related material and a more sustained focus on AI ethics in the applied linguistics curriculum. More broadly, the programme requires considerable revision to incorporate computational linguistics and AI-related topics, ensuring that applied linguistics students leave with the level of preparation now expected in professional contexts where AI routinely plays a role.

Training Language and CultureVol. 9(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.