Invited Commentary on: Defining an Anastomotic Stricture Following Oesophageal Atresia Repair

Of the surgical complications of oesophageal atresia (OA) repair, anastomotic leak and stricture are the most frequently discussed; a systematic review found that each was reported in approximately 70 % of publications describing outcomes or complications of OA [1]. Interestingly, a Delphi process involving multiple stakeholder groups to select quality indicators for OA did not include stricture as a quality indicator per se, instead including the number of dilatations and re-operations on the oesophagus (“e.g. resection of stricture”) as indicators [2]. Taking in account that patients with postoperative dysphagia without any structural evidence of a narrowing should not undergo dilatation there is no agreement on the definition of a stricture [3]. Instinctively, understanding of a stricture lies somewhere between the extremes of a narrowing so recalcitrant to dilatation that it requires surgery, and the ones responding to one or a very limited number of dilatations.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invited Commentary on: Defining an Anastomotic Stricture Following Oesophageal Atresia Repair

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Invited Commentary on: Defining an Anastomotic Stricture Following Oesophageal Atresia Repair

article en

Abstract

Of the surgical complications of oesophageal atresia (OA) repair, anastomotic leak and stricture are the most frequently discussed; a systematic review found that each was reported in approximately 70 % of publications describing outcomes or complications of OA [1]. Interestingly, a Delphi process involving multiple stakeholder groups to select quality indicators for OA did not include stricture as a quality indicator per se, instead including the number of dilatations and re-operations on the oesophagus (“e.g. resection of stricture”) as indicators [2]. Taking in account that patients with postoperative dysphagia without any structural evidence of a narrowing should not undergo dilatation there is no agreement on the definition of a stricture [3]. Instinctively, understanding of a stricture lies somewhere between the extremes of a narrowing so recalcitrant to dilatation that it requires surgery, and the ones responding to one or a very limited number of dilatations.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.