Between Attribution and Misattribution

The article examines the provenance history of two ancient objects: a Roman head in the Getty Museum (Inv.-No. 79.AA.135) and a counterweight in the Musée du Louvre (Inv.-No. E 25286). Both objects are linked to the collection of the French physician and antiquities collector Daniel Marie Fouquet (1850-1914). This research highlights the importance of a critical re-evaluation of existing documentation, particularly in relation to previous attributions and exclusions from the Fouquet collection. It also addresses a significant misunderstanding surrounding the 1922 auction of the collection, showing that several individuals involved have been misidentified in earlier research. These inaccuracies have contributed to confusion in reconstructing the collection’s history and dispersion. More broadly, the case demonstrates ongoing challenges in researching Fouquet’s collection and his historical network and provides a foundation for future research on Fouquet’s role as a collector and the relevance of provenance research today.

Publication Details

Journal
University Library Heidelberg
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48640/tf.2025.1.113823
Primary Topic
Paleopathology and ancient diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Attribution and Misattribution

University Library Heidelberg
Paleopathology and ancient diseases
article

Between Attribution and Misattribution

article en

Abstract

The article examines the provenance history of two ancient objects: a Roman head in the Getty Museum (Inv.-No. 79.AA.135) and a counterweight in the Musée du Louvre (Inv.-No. E 25286). Both objects are linked to the collection of the French physician and antiquities collector Daniel Marie Fouquet (1850-1914). This research highlights the importance of a critical re-evaluation of existing documentation, particularly in relation to previous attributions and exclusions from the Fouquet collection. It also addresses a significant misunderstanding surrounding the 1922 auction of the collection, showing that several individuals involved have been misidentified in earlier research. These inaccuracies have contributed to confusion in reconstructing the collection’s history and dispersion. More broadly, the case demonstrates ongoing challenges in researching Fouquet’s collection and his historical network and provides a foundation for future research on Fouquet’s role as a collector and the relevance of provenance research today.

University Library Heidelberg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Paleopathology and ancient diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Attribution and Misattribution · University Library Heidelberg (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS