Evaluating peat pasture performance under elevated groundwater conditions

Historically, Dutch peatlands have been drained for agriculture, particularly as pastures for dairy production. While drainage increases productivity, it degrades the peat layer, leading to high greenhouse gas emissions and soil subsidence. Raising the depth of the groundwater table (WT) to 20 cm below field level, contrasted to commonly drained peat at approximately 50 cm below field level, is considered an effective solution to limit peat degradation. However, it is unclear how raising the WT with an active water infiltration system (AWIS) would affect grass yield and quality, and whether dairy farming can be maintained. We studied the effect of raising WT on grass production, quality, and nitrogen utilization, using experimental plots with different WT and fertilization levels in 2020–2024. Raising WT from 50 to 20 cm below field level resulted in an average decrease of 9 % in herbage dry matter yield (DMY), with significant variation between years due to varying weather conditions. The reduction in DMY could partly be explained by the observed decrease in soil N supply in wetter conditions, due to a lower mineralization rate. Increased N fertilization could mediate the lower DMY but increases nutrient losses. Herbage crude protein concentration was moderately affected by WT, and more strongly by yearly variation. Although results are on plot level, which excludes losses originating from trafficking by machinery and animals, they indicate that raising WT is compatible with relatively high grass production and similar grass quality. Consequences on farm level need to be further explored. • Grass yields decreased with 9 % when raising groundwater table from 50 to 20 cm. • Fertilizer apparent N recovery and N use efficiency were unaffected by water table. • Grass had less protein at high groundwater tables, energy value was not affected. • Yearly weather conditions caused significant variations for the studied parameters. • We recommend further research on farm level implications of raising water tables.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127961
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating peat pasture performance under elevated groundwater conditions

1 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
article

Evaluating peat pasture performance under elevated groundwater conditions

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Historically, Dutch peatlands have been drained for agriculture, particularly as pastures for dairy production. While drainage increases productivity, it degrades the peat layer, leading to high greenhouse gas emissions and soil subsidence. Raising the depth of the groundwater table (WT) to 20 cm below field level, contrasted to commonly drained peat at approximately 50 cm below field level, is considered an effective solution to limit peat degradation. However, it is unclear how raising the WT with an active water infiltration system (AWIS) would affect grass yield and quality, and whether dairy farming can be maintained. We studied the effect of raising WT on grass production, quality, and nitrogen utilization, using experimental plots with different WT and fertilization levels in 2020–2024. Raising WT from 50 to 20 cm below field level resulted in an average decrease of 9 % in herbage dry matter yield (DMY), with significant variation between years due to varying weather conditions. The reduction in DMY could partly be explained by the observed decrease in soil N supply in wetter conditions, due to a lower mineralization rate. Increased N fertilization could mediate the lower DMY but increases nutrient losses. Herbage crude protein concentration was moderately affected by WT, and more strongly by yearly variation. Although results are on plot level, which excludes losses originating from trafficking by machinery and animals, they indicate that raising WT is compatible with relatively high grass production and similar grass quality. Consequences on farm level need to be further explored. • Grass yields decreased with 9 % when raising groundwater table from 50 to 20 cm. • Fertilizer apparent N recovery and N use efficiency were unaffected by water table. • Grass had less protein at high groundwater tables, energy value was not affected. • Yearly weather conditions caused significant variations for the studied parameters. • We recommend further research on farm level implications of raising water tables.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 174
Louis Bolk Instituut (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.