Optimizing the Organic Rankine Cycle Fluid for Flue Gas Energy Recovery: A Techno‐Economic Analysis

Abstract This study evaluates the thermodynamic and economic performance of various working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)‐based energy recovery from flue gases. Initially, benzene, toluene, and pentane were analyzed, with results indicating that pentane achieved the highest power output (1862 kW) with the lowest cost ($14.69 million) at 171.6 °C. To extend the analysis, additional working fluids—including hexane, R134a, propane, and isopentane—were examined for their thermal properties and system compatibility. Their thermal efficiency, power output, and cost‐effectiveness were assessed using Aspen HYSYS (Version 14) for process simulations, Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for economic evaluation, and Refprop for thermodynamic property calculations. The findings indicate that hexane improves thermal efficiency by 20 %, whereas R134a reduces environmental impact by 15 %, making them viable alternatives for sustainable ORC applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.70057
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the Organic Rankine Cycle Fluid for Flue Gas Energy Recovery: A Techno‐Economic Analysis

2 citations
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
1.43
article

Optimizing the Organic Rankine Cycle Fluid for Flue Gas Energy Recovery: A Techno‐Economic Analysis

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the thermodynamic and economic performance of various working fluids for Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)‐based energy recovery from flue gases. Initially, benzene, toluene, and pentane were analyzed, with results indicating that pentane achieved the highest power output (1862 kW) with the lowest cost ($14.69 million) at 171.6 °C. To extend the analysis, additional working fluids—including hexane, R134a, propane, and isopentane—were examined for their thermal properties and system compatibility. Their thermal efficiency, power output, and cost‐effectiveness were assessed using Aspen HYSYS (Version 14) for process simulations, Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for economic evaluation, and Refprop for thermodynamic property calculations. The findings indicate that hexane improves thermal efficiency by 20 %, whereas R134a reduces environmental impact by 15 %, making them viable alternatives for sustainable ORC applications.

Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Ming Chi University of Technology (TW), Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.