The Order of the Emanation of the Five Elements in Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1:

The present paper reexamines a passage on emanation of puruṣa in Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1, which contains the earliest reference to the fixed order of the five elements (space, wind, fire, water, earth) that is widely accepted and propagated in successive philosophical texts. While later scholastic traditions explain the fixed order of the five elements by the “accumulation theory,” this explanatory model emerges several centuries after the composition of the Taittirīyopaniṣad. By comparing its emanation sequence with the description of rebirth through the path of fathers in Chāndogyopaniṣad 5.10.5–6, this study shows that Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1 is best understood as a transformation of a liturgical model of transmigration into an elementological framework. This interpretation not only clarifies the original rationale behind the Taittirīyopaniṣad’s elemental order but also reveals a previously overlooked continuity between Vedic ritual idea and subsequent philosophical systematizations.

Publication Details

Journal
University Library Heidelberg
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2025.4.28577
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Order of the Emanation of the Five Elements in Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1:

University Library Heidelberg
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

The Order of the Emanation of the Five Elements in Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1:

article en

Abstract

The present paper reexamines a passage on emanation of puruṣa in Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1, which contains the earliest reference to the fixed order of the five elements (space, wind, fire, water, earth) that is widely accepted and propagated in successive philosophical texts. While later scholastic traditions explain the fixed order of the five elements by the “accumulation theory,” this explanatory model emerges several centuries after the composition of the Taittirīyopaniṣad. By comparing its emanation sequence with the description of rebirth through the path of fathers in Chāndogyopaniṣad 5.10.5–6, this study shows that Taittirīyopaniṣad 2.1 is best understood as a transformation of a liturgical model of transmigration into an elementological framework. This interpretation not only clarifies the original rationale behind the Taittirīyopaniṣad’s elemental order but also reveals a previously overlooked continuity between Vedic ritual idea and subsequent philosophical systematizations.

University Library Heidelberg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.