Disaster Management Practices Among Cities in the National Capital Region: Towards Development of a Mitigation Plan

The Philippines, particularly low-lying NCR cities like Marikina, Malabon, and Navotas, is highly vulnerable to climate-related disasters. This study compared disaster management practices in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction, and examined how these relate to LGU institutional capacity. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from CEMO/CENRO, DRRM, and CSWDO personnel through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. Results show that recovery and rehabilitation are consistently implemented, while reconstruction practices vary. Budgets, facilities, and manpower are generally strong, but technology integration differs across cities. Significant differences in disaster management practices were observed, with higher LGU capacity strongly correlating with more effective implementation (r = 0.852, p = 0.002). The findings highlight the need to enhance reconstruction, technology use, and relocation strategies to support resilient, evidence-based mitigation planning.

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Sustainable Development Studies
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65401/660438
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disaster Management Practices Among Cities in the National Capital Region: Towards Development of a Mitigation Plan

Perspectives in Sustainable Development Studies
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Disaster Management Practices Among Cities in the National Capital Region: Towards Development of a Mitigation Plan

article en

Abstract

The Philippines, particularly low-lying NCR cities like Marikina, Malabon, and Navotas, is highly vulnerable to climate-related disasters. This study compared disaster management practices in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction, and examined how these relate to LGU institutional capacity. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from CEMO/CENRO, DRRM, and CSWDO personnel through questionnaires, interviews, and document reviews. Results show that recovery and rehabilitation are consistently implemented, while reconstruction practices vary. Budgets, facilities, and manpower are generally strong, but technology integration differs across cities. Significant differences in disaster management practices were observed, with higher LGU capacity strongly correlating with more effective implementation (r = 0.852, p = 0.002). The findings highlight the need to enhance reconstruction, technology use, and relocation strategies to support resilient, evidence-based mitigation planning.

Perspectives in Sustainable Development StudiesVol. 1(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.