Sedation management in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: Meta-analysis review

Sedation is crucial for managing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but agents differ in their effects. Propofol, benzodiazepines and <i>α</i> <sub>2</sub>-agonists are commonly used, yet their comparative impact remains unclear. This review searched OVID MEDLINE and Embase from January 2006 to June 2025 for randomised controlled trials in adult ICU patients. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation; secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay, delirium and mortality. Twenty-six trials (<i>N</i> = 4,993) were included. Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD] -0.60 days; 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.31), with larger effects <i>versus</i> midazolam (MD -1.25 days) and mixed comparators (MD -1.23 days), but not <i>versus</i> propofol (MD -0.34 days). ICU stay was also reduced (MD -0.94 days; 95 % CI -1.49 to -0.39). Delirium risk decreased (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38-0.87). No mortality difference was found. Dexmedetomidine is therefore associated with a modest but clinically meaningful reduction in ventilation time, ICU stay and delirium, particularly when compared with benzodiaze-pines, though benefits over propofol are less certain.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Pharmaceutica
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/acph-2026-0003
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sedation management in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: Meta-analysis review

Acta Pharmaceutica
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Sedation management in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: Meta-analysis review

article en

Abstract

Sedation is crucial for managing mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but agents differ in their effects. Propofol, benzodiazepines and <i>α</i> <sub>2</sub>-agonists are commonly used, yet their comparative impact remains unclear. This review searched OVID MEDLINE and Embase from January 2006 to June 2025 for randomised controlled trials in adult ICU patients. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation; secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay, delirium and mortality. Twenty-six trials (<i>N</i> = 4,993) were included. Dexmedetomidine significantly shortened mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD] -0.60 days; 95 % CI -0.89 to -0.31), with larger effects <i>versus</i> midazolam (MD -1.25 days) and mixed comparators (MD -1.23 days), but not <i>versus</i> propofol (MD -0.34 days). ICU stay was also reduced (MD -0.94 days; 95 % CI -1.49 to -0.39). Delirium risk decreased (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38-0.87). No mortality difference was found. Dexmedetomidine is therefore associated with a modest but clinically meaningful reduction in ventilation time, ICU stay and delirium, particularly when compared with benzodiaze-pines, though benefits over propofol are less certain.

Acta PharmaceuticaVol. 76(1)
Hubei Polytechnic University (CN)
Hubei Polytechnic University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.