Perceptions of project-based learning in CDIO-aligned curricula: an exploratory cluster analysis of a five-university survey in South Africa

Engineering education in Africa is undergoing a transformative shift, seeking to align with global standards while addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of the region. The integration of innovative teaching methodologies, such as Project-Based Learning (PBL), has emerged as a promising strategy to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Within this paradigm, the CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) framework provides a structured approach to developing engineering competencies that are both technically robust and contextually relevant. However, evaluating the effectiveness of such educational strategies in diverse and resource-constrained environments remains a significant challenge. Unsupervised machine learning offers a powerful and scalable solution to this challenge. By analyzing complex, multidimensional data without predefined labels, it can uncover hidden patterns and insights into how students engage with PBL methodologies under the CDIO framework. This approach enables a nuanced understanding of student and staff behaviors, learning outcomes, and contextual factors that influence success through capacity building. This article explores how an unsupervised machine learning approach can be applied to understand and enhance the implementation of PBL using the CDIO framework in African engineering education. Adapting these data-driven insights from a five-university South African sample, this study proposes actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers, while noting that broader generalisation beyond similar contexts requires further multi-country validation

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SEFI Journal of Engineering Education Advancement
Published
2025-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62492/sefijeea.v2i2.33
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of project-based learning in CDIO-aligned curricula: an exploratory cluster analysis of a five-university survey in South Africa

SEFI Journal of Engineering Education Advancement
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Perceptions of project-based learning in CDIO-aligned curricula: an exploratory cluster analysis of a five-university survey in South Africa

article en

Abstract

Engineering education in Africa is undergoing a transformative shift, seeking to align with global standards while addressing the unique challenges and opportunities of the region. The integration of innovative teaching methodologies, such as Project-Based Learning (PBL), has emerged as a promising strategy to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Within this paradigm, the CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate) framework provides a structured approach to developing engineering competencies that are both technically robust and contextually relevant. However, evaluating the effectiveness of such educational strategies in diverse and resource-constrained environments remains a significant challenge. Unsupervised machine learning offers a powerful and scalable solution to this challenge. By analyzing complex, multidimensional data without predefined labels, it can uncover hidden patterns and insights into how students engage with PBL methodologies under the CDIO framework. This approach enables a nuanced understanding of student and staff behaviors, learning outcomes, and contextual factors that influence success through capacity building. This article explores how an unsupervised machine learning approach can be applied to understand and enhance the implementation of PBL using the CDIO framework in African engineering education. Adapting these data-driven insights from a five-university South African sample, this study proposes actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers, while noting that broader generalisation beyond similar contexts requires further multi-country validation

SEFI Journal of Engineering Education AdvancementVol. 2(2)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA), University of South Africa (ZA), Aston University (GB), Durban University of Technology (ZA), King's College London (GB), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Warwick (GB), Institute for the Future (US), University of Glasgow (GB)
Royal Academy of Engineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.