Temporal niche partitioning by nocturnal arboreal mammals increases the modularity of plant–frugivore networks in a fragmented subtropical landscape

Abstract Animal‐mediated seed dispersal sustains plant diversity and ecosystem functioning, particularly in fragmented landscapes. However, the specific contributions of nocturnal frugivores, particularly in above‐ground (arboreal) strata, are often overlooked, leading to incomplete characterization of seed‐dispersal networks. In a dam‐created archipelago in subtropical China (Thousand Island Lake), we used arboreal camera traps to quantify the role of nocturnal mammals in plant–frugivore networks and to examine how island area and isolation shape these nocturnal interactions and overall network structure. We monitored frugivory events on fleshy‐fruited plants across 13 forest islands and constructed quantitative bipartite networks to compare diel (i.e. day–night) interaction patterns and their response to island biogeographic variables. Despite being represented by only two families (Muridae and Viverridae), nocturnal arboreal mammals accounted for ~20% of all interaction events, a substantial share second only to the dominant diurnal avian family Pycnonotidae (bulbuls). Island area positively predicted nocturnal interaction richness and its proportional contribution, whereas isolation had no significant effect. Incorporating nocturnal interactions increased network modularity and decreased nestedness, indicating temporal niche partitioning, while connectance remained unchanged. This network reorganization was consistent across the island area gradient. Our study demonstrates that nocturnal arboreal mammals substantially influence the structure of seed‐dispersal networks. Omitting their interactions underestimates network compartmentalization and overlooks key dispersal pathways. We emphasize the conservation value of large forest fragments for supporting temporally complementary disperser assemblages and robust mutualistic networks, and we recommend the integration of diel‐scale, vertical‐strata sampling into ecological network studies, while noting that generalizations to bat‐rich tropical systems should be made cautiously. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70235
Primary Topic
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal niche partitioning by nocturnal arboreal mammals increases the modularity of plant–frugivore networks in a fragmented subtropical landscape

Functional Ecology
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
article

Temporal niche partitioning by nocturnal arboreal mammals increases the modularity of plant–frugivore networks in a fragmented subtropical landscape

article en

Abstract

Abstract Animal‐mediated seed dispersal sustains plant diversity and ecosystem functioning, particularly in fragmented landscapes. However, the specific contributions of nocturnal frugivores, particularly in above‐ground (arboreal) strata, are often overlooked, leading to incomplete characterization of seed‐dispersal networks. In a dam‐created archipelago in subtropical China (Thousand Island Lake), we used arboreal camera traps to quantify the role of nocturnal mammals in plant–frugivore networks and to examine how island area and isolation shape these nocturnal interactions and overall network structure. We monitored frugivory events on fleshy‐fruited plants across 13 forest islands and constructed quantitative bipartite networks to compare diel (i.e. day–night) interaction patterns and their response to island biogeographic variables. Despite being represented by only two families (Muridae and Viverridae), nocturnal arboreal mammals accounted for ~20% of all interaction events, a substantial share second only to the dominant diurnal avian family Pycnonotidae (bulbuls). Island area positively predicted nocturnal interaction richness and its proportional contribution, whereas isolation had no significant effect. Incorporating nocturnal interactions increased network modularity and decreased nestedness, indicating temporal niche partitioning, while connectance remained unchanged. This network reorganization was consistent across the island area gradient. Our study demonstrates that nocturnal arboreal mammals substantially influence the structure of seed‐dispersal networks. Omitting their interactions underestimates network compartmentalization and overlooks key dispersal pathways. We emphasize the conservation value of large forest fragments for supporting temporally complementary disperser assemblages and robust mutualistic networks, and we recommend the integration of diel‐scale, vertical‐strata sampling into ecological network studies, while noting that generalizations to bat‐rich tropical systems should be made cautiously. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional EcologyVol. 40(2)
University of Hohenheim (DE), Princeton University (US), Princeton Public Schools (US), HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, East China Normal University, China Scholarship Council, Zhejiang University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.